Project Developer: Georgios Kamaras - sdi1400058
Course: K24 Systems Programming, Spring 2017
Date: 26/04/2017
Development Platform:
- GNU/Linux Ubuntu 16.04
- gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4)
- makefile
- console_header.h (my console's main library-file, links all of the console program's modules together)
- console_main.c (my console program's main function)
- console_functions.h console_functions.c (various functions that I use throughout my console's program)
- coord_header.h (my coordinator's main library-file, links all of the coordinator program's modules together)
- coord_main.c (my coordinator program's main function)
- coord_functions.h coord_functions.c (various functions that I use throughout my coordinator's program)
- coord_commands.h coord_commands.c (the implementation of the commands that my JMS can accept, from the coordinator's perspective)
- pool_header.h (my pool's main library-file, links all of the pool program's modules together)
- pool_main.c (my pool program's main function)
- pool_functions.h pool_functions.c (various functions that I use throughout my pool's program)
- pool_commands.h pool_commands.c (the implementation of the commands that my JMS can accept, from the pool's perspective)
- jms_script.sh (a bash script for basic statistics and manipulation of my JMS's concluded and ongoing processes and their results)
- (and README)
Use make command
Use make clean command
- (1) First, use
./jms_coord <desired-flags>command to run the JMS's coordinator e.g../jms_coord -l mypath -n 3 -w jms_out -r jms_in, - (2) then, use
./jms_console <desire-flag>command to run the JMS's console e.g../jms_console -r jms_out -w jms_in -o inputs/myinput2.txt. - At any time, use
./jms_scriptcommand to interact with the results of the instructions passed to JMS e.g../jms_script.sh -l path -c purge(making the file executable using chmod may be needed first)
- For my implementation I followed all of the exercise's specifications both in paper and on Piazza. My goal was to develop a Job Management System (JMS) able to manage a large amount of jobs and grant access to all the essential information about their execution at any time, all that in an efficient way in terms of memory and time consumption. To achive this goal, I implemented all the functionality described in the exercise's specifications.
- My JMS, basically, consists of two programs. The Coordinator (jms_coord) and the Console (jms_console). The Coordinator is the core of the whole application, so I expect that it is the first of the two programs that the user is going to run. The Console is a minimalistic user's interface with the Coordinator. The user types in the Console whatever he wants the JMS to do for him and it is through the Console that he takes whatever feedback the JMS has to give him in his command. As recommended in piazza, this happens in the following sequence: the user enters something (input1) in the Console, the Coordinator processes it, and returns some message concerning the user's input1, which the user can see through his console. Then, the user can enter something again (input2). My application is also accompanied by a bash script which the user can run at any time, to take certain information about the JMS's output concerning the various jobs that he may have submitted.
- When it comes to JMS coordinator (jms_coord) and JMS console (jms_console) implementation, as tasked, I implemented the "submit ", "status ", "status-all [time-duration]", "show-active", "show-pools", "show-finished", "suspend ", "resume " and "shutdown" commands-operations. I tried to follow the project's specifications as closely as possible, taking the liberty to do what I considered to be the best for the overall functionality of the application, wherever they seemed vague or incomplete. NOTE: Most of the above commands-operations ("status ", "status-all [time-duration]", "show-active", "show-pools", "show-finished", "suspend ", "resume ") cannot work if there have been no jobs submitted to the JMS. In such a case, by design, the JMS is going to treat them as "bad operations", meaning "unacceptable" ones. In general, the information "flows" as following; the user enters a commands in the console. The console forwards this command to the coordinator. The coordinator processes the command and then assigns it in the most proper way to his children, which are the pools. The pools process the command and start formulating an answer-output for the user and sending it to the coordinator. The coordinator takes the output and forwards it to the console. Whenever the answer-output to the user's command has ended the user can enter his next command. All the above is implemented through a protocol that I designed and implemented, which defines how each user's request is taken, processed and answered in my JMS. For more details regarding my protocol, see my "Appendix I - Protocols" section.
- When it comes to the JMS bash script (jms_script.sh), as requested by the project's specifications, it implements 3 basic commands. The user provides a (the path where he requested the jms_coord to store the outputs from the various jobs execution) and a commands. This commands can be; "list", which I have implemented as an execution of the "ls -l $path" command, or "size [n]", which I have implemented using the "du -a --max-depth=1 $path | sort -n [| tail -n$n]" command, or "purge", which I have implemented as "rm -rf $path". WARNING: Obviously, the user has to be very careful with the in which he applies the "purge" command, as it's results are irreversible.
-
Console-Coordinator Communication Protocol (jms.consocoord.pipes)
- Hand-shake: when the coordinator begins running he enters a hand-shake process in which he waits for a console to establish a "good" (defined roles and message priority) connection with him. Likewise, when a console begins running, it's first order of business is to establish a "good" connection with the JMS's coordinator.
- Responding to a command: The user enters his command to the console and the console forwards the command to the coordinator. The coordinator identifies the command and forwards it to his pools. It the waits for the pools to respond/start responding to the command, in order to forward the pools' responses to the console. From the coordinator's side, the response waiting-forwarding system is tailored to fit each command's expected needs. In overall, there are to kinds of responses to a command; a "single-phrase-response" (commands: "submit ", "status ", "suspend ", "resume " and "shutdown") or a "batch-response" (commands: "status-all [time-duration]", "show-active", "show-pools" and "show-finished"). When it comes to handling a "batch-response", the coordinator messages the console to wait a "batch-response" and the console enters a loop-mode where it prints whatever it reads from the coordinator. When the answer is over, the coordinator messages the console regarding the end of the "batch-response", and the console can ask the user to enter his next command.
-
Coordinator-Pool Communication Protocol (jms.coordpool.pipes)
- Hand-shake: when the coordinator creates a new child-pool he enters a hand-shake process in which he waits for a pool (the just-created-pool) to establish a "good" (defined roles and message priority) connection with him. Likewise, when a pool begins running, it's first order of business is to establish a "good" connection with the JMS's coordinator.
- Responding to a command: In extension to what described in the same section of the jms.consocoord.pipes, there are to kinds of responses to a command; a "single-phrase-response" or a "batch-response". The successful communication of a "batch-response" between the coordinator and the pool is achieved in the same way that it is achieved between the console and the pool. The pool messages the coordinator regarding the beginning of this response, so that it can begin to forward answers to the console, and when the response is over, the pool messages the coordinator regarding the end of this response. There are commands that in order to answer them, the coordinator needs to gather details/information/resources from many different pools. In such commands, the coordinator enters a question-response communication with each of his active pools sequentially. Because of the overall simplicity of the information flow mechanism with which I implement these functionality, and the speed that it guarantees, I didn't considered necessary to do something more complicated.
- For the creation of a date-time string for the pools' children-jobs results, I consulted the links: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10917491/building-a-date-string-in-c and https://linux.die.net/man/3/strftime
- For the redirection of the pools' children-jobs output in files, I consulted the link: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2605130/redirecting-exec-output-to-a-buffer-or-file
Georgios Kamaras: sdi1400058@di.uoa.gr