tc39/proposal-regexp-v-flag Issues
Advance to Stage 4
Closed 1align \s with White_Space
Closed 7Flag implication: `v` implies `u`?
Closed 17Unicode-aware `\w`, `\d`, and `\b` ?
Closed 20Advance to Stage 3
Closed 10Are properties of strings atomic?
Closed 32maybe more spec edits
Closed 2Backwards-compatible syntax
Closed 46Michael Saboff's Review
Closed 7Waldemar's stage 3 review
Closed 5String composition syntax
Closed 8Add syntax for string literals
Closed 16only finite sets of strings
Closed 4complement syntax/semantics
Closed 5subtract a not-proper-subset
Closed 12Concerns about ReDoS
Closed 13set of strings: longest match
Closed 3operator precedence
Closed 5attempt at complete spec
Closed 2operator syntax
Closed 1symmetric difference
Closed 7additions to the proposal
Closed 1