Echelle / SPIE_2014_ebeam

paper for the SPIE Astronomical Instrumentation conference in Montreal, topic is e-beam Si immersion gratings

Echelle/SPIE_2014_ebeam Issues

"in the .JDF file", explain .JDF or get rid of it.
Closed 10 years ago
"first result is that" -> first thing to notice is that
Closed 10 years ago
"first result is that" -> first thing to notice is that
Closed 10 years ago
"The grating pattern details are listed in Table XX" -> fix table reference
Closed 10 years ago
delete: "beyond some low residual level that we have not quantied."
Closed 10 years ago
"we have not directly measured the field distortion" -> ...directly mapped the...
Closed 10 years ago
"peak with some information" -> given some information
Closed 10 years ago
"Some fields are more errant than others" -> subfields
Closed 10 years ago
"as described elsewhere (Ref XX Wilson+)" add Dan Wilson reference
Closed 10 years ago
"field size choice in detail in Section ??." fix \ref{}
Closed 10 years ago
time-on-target time -> time-on-target
Closed 10 years ago
"We selected a 4 m spot for our immersion gratings" -> Reference table with subfield sizes listed, actually 2.9 um.
Closed 10 years ago
"centered around a mean position" ... set by the main Field deflector.
Closed 10 years ago
"Our experience is that the e-beam spot is unchanged, so long as the e-beam column is unperturbed."
Closed 10 years ago
"detailed spot size depends fine adjustments" (on fine)
Closed 10 years ago
"the jackhammer analogy" -> either clarify or axe
Closed 10 years ago
"Probably universal" -> typical
Closed 10 years ago
Fix Equation to include a phase term.
Closed 10 years ago
Should we say CA-1 or CA-1a?
Closed 10 years ago
Discusion of epsilon_n in Introduction
Closed 10 years ago