trajectory evaluation
onehun opened this issue · comments
Hello, thank you for the excellent work.
I use default parameters in room_0.yaml and evaluated tracking error (ATE)
To evaluate ATE, I used code from nice-slam.
After running 2000 frames, the ATE result was 0.025m as shown below.
The difference is about 6 times compare to your report in paper archive version (0.0040m).
Therefore I wonder is there mistakes in my evaluation.
Could you give more details about evaluations such as evaluation code??
Thank you for your help