tc39 / proposal-rm-builtin-subclassing

Remove ES6 built-in subclassing

tc39/proposal-rm-builtin-subclassing Issues

Misleading proposal name?
Updated a year ago7
It will break the web
Updated 3 years ago29
Type II support for promise `then` is essential for hooking into existing promises' lifecycles and observing them without a massive amount of complexity.
Updated 3 years ago4
Additional complexity you could remove from Promises
Updated 3 years ago17
"Have a good time"
Updated 3 years ago1
Should Type IV subclassing restrictions also apply to non-RegExp classes?
Updated 3 years ago1
In defense of Type II
Updated 3 years ago9
Type IV subclassing is largely orthogonal to other types; should it partake in the exit criteria?
Updated 3 years ago1
Moving this to TC39
Closed 4 years ago1
Deprecate `Symbol.species`
Updated 4 years ago5
Why not delegate to `this.constructor`
Updated 4 years ago1
Clarify or fix derived class constructors in the examples
Closed 4 years ago8
Leave IsRegExp out of this?
Closed 4 years ago3
Editorial suggestion: Explain what stays the same in the README
Closed 4 years ago5
What is the difference between Type 2 and Type 3?
Updated 4 years ago4
Semantics suggestion: Use SpeciesConstructor just for new.target
Updated 4 years ago9
Ambiguity about what this does for static methods in subclasses
Closed 4 years ago1