tc39 / proposal-is-error

ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Error.isError

Home Page:https://tc39.es/proposal-is-error/

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Error.isError

Spec drafted by @ljharb.

This proposal is currently Stage 1 of the process.

Rationale

I brought up concerns to the committee about Symbol.toStringTag, and how previously reliable and unspoofable Object#toString calls would now no longer be reliable. The committee consensus was that as long as there were prototype methods for all builtins that, at the least, threw an error when an internal slot was not present, that would be sufficient to serve as a reliable branding test.

However, the internal slot for Error instances (and its subclasses) is only checked in Object#toString itself - leaving no possible reliable test in a world with Symbol.toStringTag.

instanceof Error, of course, is unreliable because it will provide a false negative with a cross-realm (eg, from an iframe, or node's vm modules) Error instance.

Use cases

This list is not exhaustive.

  • debugging: it is very helpful to humans, even if not always to programs, to know what kind of thing a value is. Knowing if something is a "real" native error is thus valuable information to make available, including to error-reporting libraries.
  • serialization: platforms such as RunKit need to serialize values safely and reconstruct them or describe them in the user’s browser. brand checking is critical for this.
  • structuredClone: this HTML method, which is also in node, brand-checks, and has special behavior for native Errors. JS programs need a way to know in advance if this behavior will be applied

Spec

You can view the spec rendered as HTML.

About

ECMAScript Proposal, specs, and reference implementation for Error.isError

https://tc39.es/proposal-is-error/

License:MIT License


Languages

Language:HTML 99.9%Language:JavaScript 0.1%