![image](https://private-user-images.githubusercontent.com/1150684/337702252-a1c0833d-3c84-46d1-be79-e17234efab70.png?jwt=eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.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.DbnTYuqmtVAsJf6OYcggl2p_t12EMGf7q7ob5FNKgOw)
jollyexec is an execution proxy - it presents a configurable web server that will execute commands, and return their output. But, it has some ideas about security. It could also be called an API wrapper for unix command execution.
It solves some of the hassles of passing files to a command through an HTTP server by doing things like allowing you to specify if a file should be sent as stdin to a process, or whether it needs to be stuck into a temporary file and the path passed to the file.
It has a very simple "execution template" to allow you to "hardcode" the command to be executed as much as possible, to limit the client from executing things you don't want it to.
My use case was for allowing a container to execute commands on the host without providing a more general execution mechanism like ssh, which, if abused, could dissolve the container<->host security boundary.
Configuration is done with a simple JSON file that specifies a list of routes, where each route corresponds to a command. Take the following example:
{
routes: [
¦ {
¦ ¦ path: reverse,
¦ ¦ command: rev,
¦ ¦ args: [%s]
]
}
This creates a route accessible at /reverse
on the web server. This will execute the unix command rev
which reverses an input file. It will accept a file in the request and pass it to the command as standard input (the %s
in the args does that).
So this would be the equivalent of cat file | rev
being executed on the host. The client is passing the file, but can't control the execution of rev
.
The full argument format is:
- %s - pass a file via standard input
- %f - pass a file via a path
- %p - pass a generic parameter as a switch (can't have spaces)
- "raw_string" - pass the exact parameter "raw_string (also can't have spaces)"
The included jollyexec_wrapper.sh
is a simple shell script that wraps this execution for you, to make it easier to invoke on the client. It's a shell script to reduce the dependencies needed in the container (i.e. avoiding the need for a full python interpreter).
It will take the route name, a variable list of parameters and paths, and construct the JSON request required, as well as convert the resulting stdout, stderr streams and exit code after execution.
It takes the following switches:
- route - what function/command you want to invoke on the jolly executioner
- -p - pass a parameter value
- -f - pass a file to be uploaded
So an example invocation for the above config file would be:
./jollyexec_wrapper.sh reverse -f file.txt
There's no need to use the wrapper if you don't want to, and you can just deal with the JSON directly.
The intention is to limit the flexibility of what the client can cause to execute as much as possible. So while it's possible to execute bash -c
and allow the client to pass whatever it wants as a parameter (i.e. %p), that defeats much of the point. Whenever flexibility is desired, create a new route, and hardcode the required switches, rather than making it variable for the client.
By way of problematic example, let's say you want to reflect a file back to the client using cat
, but you'd like to have two options, one outputs the file as it would appear, and the other escapes control characters (i.e. the -e
switch to cat). One could allow a parameter to be submitted by the client where the client could include the -e
switch or not. However, this would allow any input, such that the client could pass in /etc/passwd
and get the contents of the passwd file. Instead create two different routes one which hardcodes the -e
switch and the other which hardcodes the -v
switch.
There's a TODO below about creating a filter for parameters.
The JSON input is made up dynamically based on the execution template you create in the configuration file. Files end up as part of a files
dictionary and parameters in a params
dictionary. Files need to be base64 encoded (no line wrapping). Here's an example:
{
"files": [
{"filename": "file1.txt", "data": "'"$(base64 -w0 file1.txt)"'"}
],
"params": [
"param2"
]
}
The filename can be anything and is only really used for error handling.
The resulting routes can be seen by querying the /help
route. This will output plain text (not HTML ;) ) with a list of example curl invocations.
Responses are simpler and are a simple JSON structure with a stdout
, stderr
and exit_code
. The two output streams are also base64 encoded and will need to be decoded. The jollyexec_wrapper does this by writing to a temporary file rather than capturing the output to a variable because doing the latter seems to mess with the resulting binary (i.e. actual code would handle this better than a shell script).
Here's an example:
{"exit_code":0,"stderr":"Zm9vCg==","stdout":"YmFyCg=="}
Comes from a Rumjacks song https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sAmgZkPnOS4
- Create a regex filter for parameters to limit what values a client can submit, or at least force someone to consider it.
- Automatically generate linux sandbox profile based on the execution profile as described by @staaldraad here https://infosec.exchange/@staaldraad/112575264607974109