ponggung / testPython

my python test example

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

testPython

  • 放一些基本範例跟常用工具
  • Leetcode

Zen of Python, by Tim Peters

 
- Beautiful is better than ugly.
- Explicit is better than implicit.
- Simple is better than complex.
- Complex is better than complicated.
- Flat is better than nested.
- Sparse is better than dense.
- Readability counts.
- Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
- Although practicality beats purity.
- Errors should never pass silently.
- Unless explicitly silenced.
- In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
- There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
- Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
- Now is better than never.
- Although never is often better than *right* now.
- If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
- If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
- Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!

Python之禪by Tim Peters  

  • 優美勝於醜陋(Python 以編寫優美的代碼為目標)
  • 明了勝於晦澀(優美的代碼應當是明了的,命名規範,風格相似)
  • 簡潔勝於復雜(優美的代碼應當是簡潔的,不要有復雜的內部實現)
  • 複雜勝於凌亂(如果復雜不可避免,那代碼間也不能有難懂的關係,要保持接口簡潔)
  • 扁平勝於嵌套(優美的代碼應當是扁平的,不能有太多的嵌套)
  • 間隔勝於緊湊(優美的代碼有適當的間隔,不要奢望一行代碼解決問題)
  • 可讀性很重要(優美的代碼是可讀的)
  • 即便假借特例的實用性之名,也不可違背這些規則(這些規則至高無上)  
  • 不要包容所有錯誤,除非你確定需要這樣做(精準地捕獲異常,不寫except:pass 風格的代碼)  
  • 當存在多種可能,不要嘗試去猜測
  • 而是盡量找一種,最好是唯一一種明顯的解決方案(如果不確定,就用窮舉法)
  • 雖然這並不容易,因為你不是Python 之父(這裡的Dutch 是指Guido )  
  • 做也許好過不做,但不假思索就動手還不如不做(動手之前要細思量)  
  • 如果你無法向人描述你的方案,那肯定不是一個好方案;反之亦然(方案測評標準)  
  • 命名空間是一種絕妙的理念,我們應當多加利用(倡導與號召)

About

my python test example


Languages

Language:Python 97.8%Language:Dockerfile 1.7%Language:Shell 0.5%