This benchmark was designed for a specific scenario. Do not take it into account when making decisions about your projects or your company's products.
If you are in any doubt, I suggest you do your own tests according to your scenario and using tools and methods that suit your case.
The purpose of this benchmark is to test whether using Dynamic Dispatch, instead of Static Dispatch, exclusively on the dependencies of a Handler impacts the performance of an application considerably.
$ wrk -t12 -c400 -d30s http://127.0.0.1:8080/primes
Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/primes
12 threads and 400 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 195.43ms 18.57ms 422.88ms 78.14%
Req/Sec 102.81 39.24 280.00 66.58%
36927 requests in 30.10s, 21.22GB read
Socket errors: connect 155, read 242, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 1226.96
Transfer/sec: 722.02MB$ wrk -t12 -c400 -d30s http://127.0.0.1:8080/primes
Running 30s test @ http://127.0.0.1:8080/primes
12 threads and 400 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 197.47ms 21.05ms 423.41ms 78.12%
Req/Sec 102.00 47.90 270.00 61.69%
36515 requests in 30.09s, 20.98GB read
Socket errors: connect 155, read 258, write 0, timeout 0
Requests/sec: 1213.40
Transfer/sec: 714.04MBAlthough Dynamic Dispatch has a lower performance compared to Static Dispatch, this difference is minute and does not negatively impact the overall performance of the application.