mpenet / flex

Using TCP congestion control methods to find/set real limits of a system over time

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

flex

icon by https://thenounproject.com/ivankostriukov/

WIP

Hold your horses!

Library that implements various methods from TCP congestion control to request limiting. It's said to be adaptive in the sense that the concurrency limit of a system will evolve over time as we observe/measure average request round trip time.

We provide both a middleware and an interceptor that will limit concurrency according to the limit algo specified.

A typical setup is composed of :

  • a Limit: defines how the concurrency limit of a context evolve from RTT averages, dropped requests, timeout. Flex has an additive-increase/multiplicative-decrease (AIMD) implementation right now and a few others more experimental.

  • Sampler: samples RTT for a context in order to compute an average to be used later by Limit when computing a new concurrency limit. It's pluggable so you can imagine more fine grained sampling, time-boxed, multi-values (min/max), percentiles and whatnot. It's really easy to implement/extend.

  • Request : takes a Sampler and a Limitimplementation and allows to performs recording of a request Lifecycle (accepted/rejected/completed) and trigger subsequent concurrency limits update. Typically upon every hit to a system a Request is acquired for checks/update.

  • Limiter (naming subject to change) : very thin component that will encapsulate a sampler/limit/request implementation and allow to acquire a Request to inspect/update the concurrency limits depending on the request lifecycle (accept/reject/etc). We can also assign quotas at this level: we can have many Limiters per Limit/Sampler, this allows to say client A should only be allowed 20% of the available concurrency limits against that system and so on (it's set per Limiter instance).

How it works in practice:

Typically when we observe that average rtt increase we might decrease the acceptable concurrency limit value and in case of average rtt decrease we would slowly increase that value. Depending on the Limit implementation used, the rate at which the concurrency limit increase/decrease happens can vary. Then the middleware or the interceptor or whatever you choose to implement on top, would compare the number of current in-flight requests against the current concurrency limit to decide to reject/accept/ignore it and then trigger an update of the concurrency limit accordingly.

Over time we would see the actual concurrency limit of a service stabilise/converge to a level that is its actual acceptable rate for near optimal operation and it would adapt with the health of the system it protects: if the system is stable it will try to increase limits slowly up to max-limit, if it's struggling it will lower the limit and cause requests to be rejected at the edge.

This strategies can be applied to many context, they can be used at client level, server, queues, executors, per API endpoint, etc...

Installation

{:deps {com.s-exp/flex {:git/sha "..." :git/url "https://github.com/mpenet/flex"}}}

Usage

For now just playing via https://github.com/mpenet/flex/blob/main/dev/playground.clj

The ring middleware or the interceptor are also decent examples of how things work on the surface.

Options

[wip]

Examples

[wip]

License

Copyright © 2022 Max Penet

Distributed under the Eclipse Public License version 1.0.

About

Using TCP congestion control methods to find/set real limits of a system over time


Languages

Language:Clojure 99.3%Language:Emacs Lisp 0.7%