A package for modeling optimization problems containing piecewise linear functions. Current support is for (the graphs of) continuous univariate functions.
This package is an accompaniment to a paper entitled Nonconvex piecewise linear functions: Advanced formulations and simple modeling tools, by Joey Huchette and Juan Pablo Vielma.
This package offers helper functions for the JuMP algebraic modeling language.
Consider a piecewise linear function. The function is described in terms of the breakpoints between pieces, and the function value at those breakpoints.
Consider a JuMP model
using JuMP, PiecewiseLinearOpt
m = Model()
@variable(m, x)
To model the graph of a piecewise linear function f(x)
, take d
as some set of breakpoints along the real line, and fd = [f(x) for x in d]
as the corresponding function values. You can model this function in JuMP using the following function:
z = piecewiselinear(m, x, d, fd)
@objective(m, Min, z) # minimize f(x)
For another example, think of a piecewise linear approximation for for the function
using JuMP, PiecewiseLinearOpt
m = Model()
@variable(m, x)
@variable(m, y)
z = piecewiselinear(m, x, y, 0:0.1:1, 0:0.1:1, (u,v) -> exp(u+v))
@objective(m, Min, z)
Current support is limited to modeling the graph of a continuous piecewise linear function, either univariate or bivariate, with the goal of adding support for the epigraphs of lower semicontinuous piecewise linear functions.
Supported univariate formulations:
- Convex combination (
:CC
) - Multiple choice (
:MC
) - Native SOS2 branching (
:SOS2
) - Incremental (
:Incremental
) - Logarithmic (
:Logarithmic
; default) - Disaggregated Logarithmic (
:DisaggLogarithmic
) - Binary zig-zag (
:ZigZag
) - General integer zig-zag (
:ZigZagInteger
)
Supported bivariate formulations for entire constraint:
- Convex combination (
:CC
) - Multiple choice (
:MC
) - Dissaggregated Logarithmic (
:DisaggLogarithmic
)
Also, you can use any univariate formulation for bivariate functions as well. They will be used to impose two axis-aligned SOS2 constraints, along with the "6-stencil" formulation for the triangle selection portion of the constraint. See the associated paper for more details. In particular, the following are also acceptable bivariate formulation choices:
- Native SOS2 branching (
:SOS2
) - Incremental (
:Incremental
) - Logarithmic (
:Logarithmic
) - Binary zig-zag (
:ZigZag
) - General integer zig-zag (
:ZigZagInteger
)