Benchmark of Java JSON libraries

Purpose

This project benchmarks the throughput performance of a variety of Java Json libraries using JMH. It covers the following libraries:

When available, both databinding and 'stream' (custom packing and unpacking) implementations are tested. Two different kinds of models are evaluated with payloads of 1, 10, 100 and 1000 KB size:

Users: uses primitive types, String, List and simple POJOs; and
Clients: adds arrays, enum, UUID, LocalDate

This benchmark is written to:

randomly generate payloads upon static loading of the JVM/benchmark; the seed is also shared across runs
read data from RAM
write data to reusable output streams (when possible); this reduces allocation pressure
consume all output streams; to avoid dead code elimination optimization

Not evaluated are: RAM utilization, compression, payloads > 1 MB.

Results

The benchmarks are written with JMH and for Java 8.

The results here-below were computed on November the 27th, 2021 with the following libraries and versions:

Library	Version
jackson	2.13.0
genson	1.6
fastjson	1.2.78
gson	2.8.9
org.json	20210307
javax-json	1.1.4
json-io	4.13.0
flexjson	3.3
boon	0.34
json-smart	2.4.7
johnzon	1.2.15
logansquare	1.3.7
dsl-json	1.9.9
simplejson	1.1.1
nanojson	1.7
jodd json	6.0.3
moshi	1.12.0
tapestry	5.7.3
jsoniter	0.9.23
minimal-json	0.9.5
mjson	1.4.1
underscore	1.71
purejson	1.0.1
yasson	1.0.9

All graphs and sheets are available in this google doc.

Raw JMH results are available here

`Users` model

Uses: primitive types, String, List and simple POJOs

Deserialization performance

Serialization performance

`Clients` model

Uses: primitive types, String, List and simple POJOs, arrays, enum, UUID, LocalDate

Note: fewer libraries are tested with this model due to lack of support for some of the evaluated types.

Deserialization performance

Serialization performance

Benchmark configuration

Tests were run on an Amazon EC2 c5.xlarge (4 vCPU, 8 GiB RAM)

JMH info:

# JMH version: 1.33
# VM version: JDK 1.8.0_302, OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM, 25.302-b08
# VM invoker: /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.302.b08-0.amzn2.0.1.x86_64/jre/bin/java
# VM options: -XX:+AggressiveOpts -Xms2g -Xmx2g
# Blackhole mode: full + dont-inline hint (default, use -Djmh.blackhole.autoDetect=true to auto-detect)
# Warmup: 5 iterations, 10 s each
# Measurement: 10 iterations, 3 s each
# Timeout: 10 min per iteration
# Threads: 16 threads, will synchronize iterations
# Benchmark mode: Throughput, ops/time

Run

By default, running ./run ser (./run deser respectively) will run all -- stream and databind -- serialization (deserialization respectively) benchmarks with 1 KB payloads of Users.

You can also specificy which libs, apis, payload-sizes and number of iterations (and more) you want to run. For example:

./run deser --apis stream --libs genson,jackson
./run ser --apis databind,stream --libs jackson
./run deser --apis stream --libs dsljson,jackson --size 10 --datatype users

Type ./run help ser or ./run help deser to print help for those commands.

If you wish to run all benchmarks used to generate the reports above, you can run ./run-everything. This will take several hours to complete, so be patient.

Contribute

Any help to improve the existing benchmarks or write ones for other libraries is welcome.

Adding a JSON library to the benchmark requires little work and you can find numerous examples in the commit history. For instance:

Addition of moshi: https://github.com/fabienrenaud/java-json-benchmark/commit/6af2c0a7091b12a9dc768e49499682b97ea57ff6
Addition of jodd: https://github.com/fabienrenaud/java-json-benchmark/commit/288a4e61496588ed4c0a80e1f107f34f9a2c985c
Addition of json-simple: https://github.com/fabienrenaud/java-json-benchmark/commit/1e1e559c39a6eddc3dd7d7cea777fc7861415469

Pull requests are welcome.

About

Performance testing of serialization and deserialization of Java JSON libraries

MIT License

Languages

Language:Java 97.3%Language:Shell 1.2%Language:Python 1.1%Language:PowerShell 0.3%Language:Makefile 0.1%