Bindings to the DOM and other browser-specific web APIs.
Until the library reaches 1.0, expect major breaking changes to the API. See the 1.0 project for the current progress towards that goal.
everything.
All code is licensed as MIT. See LICENSE.
This project has been forked from bs-webapi after it was mostly abandoned. Rather than offer to continue that project, we took the opportunity to make major changes to the API and bring it up to modern ReScript development practices by renaming it.
Primary development on this project is sponsored by Tiny.
This project is in the process of being forked; what follows is the original readme.
Experimental bindings to the DOM and other Web APIs.
API docs are available at https://reasonml-community.github.io/bs-webapi-incubator/api/Webapi/ , but documentation comments are sparse as the code mostly just consists of external declarations with type signatures. The bindings generally also correspond very well to the Web APIs they bind to, so using MDN along with GitHub should go a long way.
npm install bs-webapi
Then add bs-webapi
to bs-dependencies
in your bsconfig.json
. A minimal example:
{
"name": "my-thing",
"sources": "src",
"bs-dependencies": ["bs-webapi"]
}
See the examples folder
Please only use the modules exposed through the toplevel module Webapi
, for example Webapi.Dom.Element
. In particular, don't use the 'flat' modules like Webapi__Dom__Element
as these are considered private and are not guaranteed to be backwards-compatible.
The DOM API is mostly organized into interfaces and relies heavily on inheritance. The ergonomics of the API is also heavily dependent on dynamic typing, which makes it somewhat challenging to implement a thin binding layer that is both safe and ergonomic. To achieve this we employ subtyping and implementation inheritance, concepts which aren't very idiomatic to OCaml (or Reason), but all the more beneficial to understand in order to be able to use these bindings effectively.
The Dom types, and the relationships between them, are actually defined in the Dom
module that ships with bs-platform
(Source code), where you'll find a bunch of types that look like this:
type _element('a);
type element_like('a) = node_like(_element('a));
type element = element_like(_baseClass);
This is subtyping implemented with abstract types and phantom arguments. The details of how this works isn't very important (but see #23 for a detailed explanation of how exactly this trickery works) in order to just use them, but there are a few things you should know:
- If you expand the alias of a concrete DOM type, you'll discover it's actually a list of abstract types. e.g.
element
expands to_baseClass _element _node _eventTarget_like
This meanselement
is a subtype of_element
,_node
and_eventTarget_like
. - The
_like
type are "open" (because they have a type variable). This means that a function accepting an'a element_like
will accept any "supertype" ofelement_like
. A function accepting just anelement
will only accept anelement
(Technicallyelement
is actually a "supertype" ofelement_like
too).
This system works exceptionally well, but has one significant flaw: It makes type errors even more complicated than they normally are. If you know what to look for it's not that bad, but unfortunately the formatting of these errors don't make looking for it any easier. We hope to improve that in other ways (see BetterErrors)
If you've looked through the source code a bit, you've likely come across code like this:
include Webapi__Dom__EventTarget.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Webapi__Dom__Node.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Webapi__Dom__ParentNode.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Webapi__Dom__NonDocumentTypeChildNode.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Webapi__Dom__ChildNode.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Webapi__Dom__Slotable.Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
include Impl({ type nonrec t = t });
This is the implementation inheritance. Each "inheritable" module defines an "Impl" module where all its exported functions are defined. include Webapi__Dom__Node.Impl { type nonrec t = t };
means that all the functions in Webapi__Dom__Node.Impl
should be included in this module, but with the t
type of that module replaced by the t
type of this one. And that's it, it now has all the functions.
Implementation inheritance is used instead of subtyping to make it easier to understand which functions operate on any given "subject". If you have an element
and you need to use a function defined in Node
, let's say removeChild
you cannot just use Node.removeChild
. Instead you need to use Element.removeChild
, which you can since Element
inherits from Node
. As a general rule, always use the function in the module corresponding to the type you have. You'll find this makes it very easy to see what types you're dealing with just by reading the code.
See CHANGELOG.md.