Redundant contact info?
dzerbino opened this issue · comments
Contact information is required at both the collection and the study level, is that too much?
Yes, I think I agree. But the study level should perhaps have some requirements as to external links. What about that we require at least one of the following?:
- contact
- publication
- global_id
By the way:
- Publications should be using doi identifiers, not pubmed
Note that in my mind, a collection could also in theory be a "mixtape" of tracks from several sources gathered for a particular purpose by someone. Thus the contact info of the collection might have nothing to do with the study. @dzerbino In our case, I suppose the contact of the studies should not really be you anyway (which might be why you raised the issue in the first place?).