vertical-bounce-handler-at-terra-knot-from-bottom-statement-through-draw-from-bottom
-
AwkPro provided a ky-skils to that knot
-
And NChist provided \a occuerance protective into that knot
-
DGodFather Vito Makhao\ne provided a protective mechanics into \assymptotic
-
And in that darkest period assymptotic was controlled by Ilyusha Ka
-
Darkest-In-Mind Lastyriene tried to take a control of assymprotic into its hands but it was produced into ln
-
ERgraph was constructed to protect knotCore from highFps
-
Knot at enough distance Lord Lorentz constructed and spawned assymprotic into that knot
-
You \have a time to do injection from \testosteron
-
"It" goes away from statement of expected
-
From some time after beginning we\ stop support "its" invariant . that is cost-expensive and we had a graph in wide, but \ wanted to have a graph in \debth
-
The question to Professor Konev - why you continue a grow of testosteron? You have a baba Eva, you need "endorfin"
-
Having that I have a high level of \testosteron
-
I had a spawning of "endorfin"
-
And my invariant was the following
-
And accurately, methodically, knot have a rush
-
\Rosguardian put all-in into nor-adrenalin of \siblings
-
And started release its memory
-
Fellow Sennikov put all-in into \endorfin
-
But chain of binding in russian language was breaken
-
Enough good investment
-
Man-fellow Babin put all-in into "dofamin"
-
And Professor Konev was believed that speciality of programmer - a level of a support person
-
But "leak" was through baba Eva
-
Professor Konev put all-in into \testosteron and high-frequency movement
-
And that's my \friend, from that invariant I started a few years ago
-
that knot possible to keep ability to use dark and use light through eye
-
and then you tried to be \fucked via \golden \dog
-
at first time, you sign agreement with \government
-
we remember venture investment from "beeline"
-
man, i knot proud you
-
that's possible
-
keep accu-rate
Strategy
Strategy through pencil and knot. Do you remember knot one? I don't remember knot one
why we need "calls"? why knot telegram?
we begin from bottom-statement <-
echo-locator (4)
pencil-from-knot (3)
-> bind (2)
pencil (1)
echo-locator traversaring updates from one knot to another knot
pencil-from-knot used for interaction with user inside knot
pointer into latest success update. "it" uses bind strategy to stack bind-updates. bind-updates are created from pencil and packaged from updates-stack into bind-updates. Pointer moved after packaging into knot.
use pencil to protect visual memory and put updates into updates-stack. <-
-
why you want to merge \everything?
-
why i need to keep "its" invariant?
-
do you understand difference between "became knot proud\ar from you" and "vereteno" ("shank from you . knot believ\ar")?
-
after many iterations we have "vereteno" from pencil
and we have pointer at head and pencil at knot <-
pencil updates itself from updates-stack (1) and from pencil from bind-updates (2) and "it" packaged into bind-updates. pointer into bind-updates. <-