ZhangLi-CS / GCP_Optimization

What Deep CNNs Benefit from Global Covariance Pooling: An Optimization Perspective

This is an code implementation of CVPR2020 paper (What Deep CNNs Benefit from Global Covariance Pooling: An Optimization Perspective(poster)), created by Qilong Wang and Li Zhang.

Introduction

Recent works have demonstrated that global covariance pooling (GCP) has the ability to improve performance of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on visual classification task. Despite considerable advance, the reasons on effectiveness of GCP on deep CNNs have not been well studied. In this paper, we make an attempt to understand what deep CNNs benefit from GCP in a viewpoint of optimization. Specifically, we explore the effect of GCP on deep CNNs in terms of the Lipschitzness of optimization loss and the predictiveness of gradients, and show that GCP can make the optimization landscape more smooth and the gradients more predictive. Furthermore, we discuss the connection between GCP and second-order optimization for deep CNNs. More importantly, above findings can account for several merits of covariance pooling for training deep CNNs that have not been recognized previously or fully explored, including significant acceleration of network convergence (i.e., the networks trained with GCP can support rapid decay of learning rates, achieving favorable performance while significantly reducing number of training epochs), stronger robustness to distorted examples generated by image corruptions and perturbations, and good generalization ability to different vision tasks, e.g., object detection and instance segmentation. We conduct extensive experiments using various deep CNN models on diversified tasks, and the results provide strong support to our findings.

Citation

@inproceedings{wang2020deep,
  title={What Deep CNNs Benefit from Global Covariance Pooling: An Optimization Perspective},
  author={Wang, Qilong and Zhang, Li and Wu, Banggu and Ren, Dongwei and Li, Peihua and Zuo, Wangmeng and Hu, Qinghua},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition},
  year={2020}
}

Environments

• OS: Ubuntu 16.04
• CUDA: 9.0/10.0
• Toolkit: PyTorch 1.3/1.4
• GPU: GTX 2080Ti/TiTan XP

Installation

a. Create a conda virtual environment and activate it.

conda create -n gcp-optimization python=3.7

conda activate gcp-optimization

b. Install PyTorch and torchvision following the official instructions, e.g.,

conda install pytorch torchvision -c pytorch

c. Clone the GCP_Optimization repository.

git clone https://github.com/ZhangLi-CS/GCP_Optimization.git

cd GCP_Optimization

Plot Loss Landscape and Gradient Predictiveness

1. Test MobileNetV2 models' LandScape: In the floder ./landscape/MobileNetV2 , run sh ./scripts/train.sh

2. Test ResNet models' LandScape: In the floder ./landscape/ResNet , run sh ./scripts/train.sh

*Note that you need to modify the dataset path or model name in train.sh for fitting your configurations, and descriptions on all parameters can be found in file ./landscape/readme.txt.

Experiments on ImageNet

Setting Parameters

LRnorm: The settings of lr in each original paper.

LRfast: The settings of lr have the fastest convergence.

LRadju: The settings of lr make the best trade-off between convergence speed and classification accuracy.

Training Models

1. Training models (except ShuffleNetV2) on ImageNet : In floder src , run sh ./scripts/train/train.sh

2. Training ShuffleNetV2 models on ImageNet : In floder src , run sh ./scripts/train/train_shufflenet.sh

3. Testing models on ImageNet : In floder src , run sh ./scripts/val/val.sh

*Note that you need to modify the dataset path or model name in train.sh or val.sh for fitting your configurations, and descriptions on all parameters can be found in file ./src/scripts/readme.txt.

Main Results and Models

MobileNetV2

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
MobileNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	71.62	90.18	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	va25	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRnorm
MobileNetV2_GAP_LRfast	69.29	89.01	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRfast	f5n4	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRfast
MobileNetV2_GAP_LRadju	71.27	90.08	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRadju	pai8	MobileNetV2_GAP_LRadju
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	74.39	91.86	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	3r9q	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRfast	72.45	90.51	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRfast	dq5w	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRfast
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju	73.97	91.53	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju	i7y3	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm_128	73.28	91.26	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm_128	cxhu	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm_128
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju_128	72.58	90.87	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju_128	3qdx	MobileNetV2_GCP_LRadju_128

ShuffleNetV2

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	67.96	87.84	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	rbew	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRnorm
ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRfast	66.13	86.54	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRfast	7y58	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRfast
ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRadju	67.15	87.35	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRadju	c7i8	ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRadju
ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	71.83	90.04	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	tr5u	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRnorm
ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRfast	70.29	89.00	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRfast	8qxx	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRfast
ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRadju	71.17	89.74	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRadju	nud1	ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRadju

ResNet18

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet18_GAP_LRnorm	70.47	89.59	ResNet18_GAP_LRnorm	z7ab	ResNet18_GAP_LRnorm
ResNet18_GAP_LRfast	66.02	86.69	ResNet18_GAP_LRfast	78uw	ResNet18_GAP_LRfast
ResNet18_GAP_LRadju	69.62	89.00	ResNet18_GAP_LRadju	29cn	ResNet18_GAP_LRadju
ResNet18_GCP_LRnorm	75.48	92.23	ResNet18_GCP_LRnorm	eje8	ResNet18_GCP_LRnorm
ResNet18_GCP_LRfast	72.02	89.97	ResNet18_GCP_LRfast	k6f6	ResNet18_GCP_LRfast
ResNet18_GCP_LRadju	74.86	91.81	ResNet18_GCP_LRadju	tci6	ResNet18_GCP_LRadju

ResNet34

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet34_GAP_LRnorm	74.19	91.60	ResNet34_GAP_LRnorm	1yp6	ResNet34_GAP_LRnorm
ResNet34_GAP_LRfast	69.88	89.25	ResNet34_GAP_LRfast	nmni	ResNet34_GAP_LRfast
ResNet34_GAP_LRadju	73.13	91.14	ResNet34_GAP_LRadju	5eyk	ResNet34_GAP_LRadju
ResNet34_GCP_LRnorm	77.11	93.33	ResNet34_GCP_LRnorm	bn2d	ResNet34_GCP_LRnorm
ResNet34_GCP_LRfast	73.88	91.42	ResNet34_GCP_LRfast	wmky	ResNet34_GCP_LRfast
ResNet34_GCP_LRadju	76.81	93.04	ResNet34_GCP_LRadju	4w21	ResNet34_GCP_LRadju

ResNet50

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet50_GAP_LRnorm	76.02	92.97	ResNet50_GAP_LRnorm	3r9p	ResNet50_GAP_LRnorm
ResNet50_GAP_LRfast	71.08	90.04	ResNet50_GAP_LRfast	reub	ResNet50_GAP_LRfast
ResNet50_GAP_LRadju	75.32	92.47	ResNet50_GAP_LRadju	5tdw	ResNet50_GAP_LRadju
ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm	78.56	94.09	ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm	e7iy	ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm
ResNet50_GCP_LRfast	75.31	92.11	ResNet50_GCP_LRfast	3j8e	ResNet50_GCP_LRfast
ResNet50_GCP_LRadju	78.03	93.95	ResNet50_GCP_LRadju	n4vq	ResNet50_GCP_LRadju
ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm_128	78.02	94.02	ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm_128	976a	ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm_128
ResNet50_GCP_LRadju_128	77.72	93.73	ResNet50_GCP_LRadju_128	xf7g	ResNet50_GCP_LRadju_128

ResNet101

Models	Top-1 acc.(%)	Top-5 acc.(%)	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet101_GAP_LRnorm	77.67	93.83	ResNet101_GAP_LRnorm	3u9a	ResNet101_GAP_LRnorm
ResNet101_GAP_LRfast	73.13	91.06	ResNet101_GAP_LRfast	11g2	ResNet101_GAP_LRfast
ResNet101_GAP_LRadju	77.53	93.53	ResNet101_GAP_LRadju	nikb	ResNet101_GAP_LRadju
ResNet101_GCP_LRnorm	79.47	94.71	ResNet101_GCP_LRnorm	kr4s	ResNet101_GCP_LRnorm
ResNet101_GCP_LRfast	76.38	92.82	ResNet101_GCP_LRfast	iy77	ResNet101_GCP_LRfast
ResNet101_GCP_LRadju	79.18	94.47	ResNet101_GCP_LRadju	ytfb	ResNet101_GCP_LRadju

*If you would like to evaluate above pre-trained models, please do the following:

1. Download the pre-trained models.

2. Testing on ImageNet: In floder src , run sh ./scripts/val/val_download.sh

Experiments on ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P

The datesets and evaluation code can be downloaded from https://github.com/hendrycks/robustness

Results on ImageNet-C and ImageNet-P

Method	IMAGENET-C		IMAGENET-P
	mCE	Relative mCE	mFP	mT5D
MobileNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	86.4	113.6	79.1	96.0
MobileNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	81.7	110.6	64.3	87.6
ShuffleNetV2_GAP_LRnorm	92.7	126.7	94.7	108.2
ShuffleNetV2_GCP_LRnorm	85.2	112.6	75.2	95.5
ResNet18+	84.7	103.9	72.8	87.0
ResNet18_GCP_LRnorm	76.3	101.3	53.2	77.1
ResNet34+	77.9	98.7	61.7	79.5
ResNet34_GCP_LRnorm	72.4	96.9	47.7	72.4
ResNet50+	76.7	105.0	58.0	78.3
ResNet50_GCP_LRnorm	70.7	97.9	47.5	74.6
ResNet101+	70.3	93.7	52.6	73.9
ResNet101_GCP_LRnorm	65.5	89.1	42.1	68.3

*The models which with + can be download from pytroch, and other models can be found in Section of Main Results and Models.

Experiments on Object Detection and Instance Segmentation

We use the mmdetection to train/evaluate our models on Object Detection and Instance Segmentation.

Object Detection Results and Models on COCO val2017

Faster R-CNN

Backbone Model	Method	AP	AP50	AP75	APS	APM	APL	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet50	GAP	36.4	58.2	39.2	21.8	40.0	46.2	ResNet50_GAP	nohm	ResNet50_GAP
	GCPD	36.6	58.4	39.5	21.3	40.8	47.0	ResNet50_GCP_D	ct92	ResNet50_GCP_D
	GCPM	37.1	59.1	39.9	22.0	40.9	47.6	ResNet50_GCP_M	4coy	ResNet50_GCP_M
ResNet101	GAP	38.7	60.6	41.9	22.7	43.2	50.4	ResNet101_GAP	c4op	ResNet101_GAP
	GCPD	39.5	60.7	43.1	22.9	44.1	51.4	ResNet101_GCP_D	f1nb	ResNet101_GCP_D
	GCPM	39.6	61.2	43.1	23.3	43.9	51.3	ResNet101_GCP_M	2jek	ResNet101_GCP_M

Mask R-CNN

Backbone Model	Method	AP	AP50	AP75	APS	APM	APL	BaiduDrive(models)	Extract code	GoogleDrive
ResNet50	GAP	37.2	58.9	40.3	22.2	40.7	48.0	ResNet50_GAP	wg4y	ResNet50_GAP
	GCPD	37.3	58.8	40.4	22.0	41.1	48.2	ResNet50_GCP_D	b7fw	ResNet50_GCP_D
	GCPM	37.9	59.4	41.3	22.4	41.5	49.0	ResNet50_GCP_M	3p37	ResNet50_GCP_M
ResNet101	GAP	39.4	60.9	43.3	23.0	43.7	51.4
	GCPD	40.3	61.5	44.0	24.1	44.7	52.5	ResNet101_GCP_D	fdhq	ResNet101_GCP_D
	GCPM	40.7	62.0	44.6	23.9	45.2	52.9	ResNet101_GCP_M	0fbl	ResNet101_GCP_M

Instance Segmentation Results on COCO val2017

Mask R-CNN

Backbone Model	Method	AP	AP50	AP75	APS	APM	APL
ResNet50	GAP	34.1	55.5	36.2	16.1	36.7	50.0
	GCPD	34.2	55.3	36.4	15.8	37.1	50.1
	GCPM	34.7	56.3	36.8	16.4	37.5	50.6
ResNet101	GAP	35.9	57.7	38.4	16.8	39.1	53.6
	GCPD	36.5	58.2	38.9	17.3	39.9	53.5
	GCPM	36.7	58.7	39.1	17.6	39.9	53.7

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the team behind the iSQRT-COV, ImageNet-C & ImageNet-P and mmdetection for providing a nice code, and our code is based on it.

Contact

If you have any questions or suggestions, please feel free to contact us: [e-mail]; [e-mail].