This repository contains supplementary data used in INF05010 course for the 2019/1. A presentation of problems and their mathematical formulation can be found here (in portuguese). A more complete specification of the project is available here (in portuguese). Further information can be found in Moodle platform.
Instance names are formatted as follows: for VFR60_10_3_Gap
, 60
refers to the number of tasks, 5
refers to the number of machines, 3
refers to instance id within 60_10
family.
The format of files is described in last paragraph of Section 3.1 of Vallada et al. (2015).
Instance | |N| | |M| | BKS |
---|---|---|---|
VFR10_15_1_Gap | 10 | 15 | 1307 |
VFR20_10_3_Gap | 20 | 10 | 1592 |
VFR20_20_1_Gap | 20 | 20 | 2270 |
VFR60_5_10_Gap | 60 | 5 | 3663 |
VFR60_10_3_Gap | 60 | 10 | 3423 |
VFR100_60_1_Gap | 100 | 60 | 9395 |
VFR500_40_1_Gap | 500 | 40 | 28548 |
VFR500_60_3_Gap | 500 | 60 | 31125 |
VFR600_20_1_Gap | 600 | 20 | 31433 |
VFR700_20_10_Gap | 700 | 20 | 36417 |
Note : Instances mirrored from Web of Instances.
Note 2: Best known solutions are presented in supplementary material from Vallada, Ruiz e Framinan (2015).
Note 3: A mathematical formulation of the problem can be found in Tseng et al. (2004).
Instance names are similar to PFSP: for 20on4Rp50Rs50_1
, 20
refers to the number of tasks, 4
refers to the number of machines, 1
refers to instance id within 20_4
family. Other components of instance name describe parameters used on instance generation. Those information can be ignored.
The third paragraph of Section 4 of Ezugwu (2019) gives a short description of instance file format.
Instance | |N| | |M| | BKS |
---|---|---|---|
20on4Rp50Rs50_1 | 20 | 4 | 527.80 ± 15.43 |
60on8Rp50Rs50_1 | 60 | 8 | 820.00 ± 9.62 |
60on4Rp50Rs50_1 | 60 | 4 | 1673.20 ± 43.67 |
80on8Rp50Rs50_1 | 80 | 8 | 1089.00 ± 7.25 |
80on12Rp50Rs50_1 | 80 | 12 | 711.60 ± 5.73 |
100on2Rp50Rs50_1 | 100 | 2 | 5872.00 ± 33.32 |
100on6Rp50Rs50_1 | 100 | 6 | 1858.40 ± 9.07 |
100on8Rp50Rs50_1 | 100 | 8 | 1371.00 ± 12.10 |
120on12Rp50Rs50_1 | 120 | 12 | 1087.80 ± 32.26 |
120on10Rp50Rs50_1 | 120 | 10 | 1326.80 ± 13.46 |
Note : Instances mirrored from Scheduling Research Virtual Center.
Note 2: Best known solutions are presented in Ezugwu (2019).
Note 3: A mathematical formulation of the problem can be found in Ezugwu (2019).
TSPDL instances are adaptations from classic datasets for TSP. Instance names use the following convention: for bayg29_10_1
, bayg
indicates the dataset to which the instance belongs, and29
indicates the number of vertices. The other informations can be ignored.
Instance format for bayg
, gr
, and ulysses
is structured and self explanatory.
For KroA
and pcb
families, check the paper of Reinelt (1991).
Instance | BKS (avg) | BKS (instance) |
---|---|---|
bayg29_10_1 | 1713.60 | 1610 |
bayg29_50_1 | 2091.00 | 2743 |
gr17_25_1 | 2237.70 | 2265 |
gr48_10_1 | 6635.70 | 5046 |
gr48_25_1 | 5800.30 | 5161.65 |
KroA200_50_1 | 30665.20 | Unpublished |
KroA200_75_1 | 30896.10 | Unpublished |
pcb442_50_1 | 59858.30 | Unpublished |
pcb442_75_1 | 61010.10 | Unpublished |
Ulysses_22_50_1 | 8425.60 | 8290 |
Note : Instances mirrored from The TSPDL Lib.
Note 2: Best known solutions are presented in Todosijević et al. (2017).
Note 3: A mathematical formulation of the problem can be found in Rakke et al. (2012).
Note 4: The BKR (avg) column presents the average best known solution to the entire instance family (bayg29_10, KroA200_50, and so forth). When available, the BKS of individual instances are presented in column BKS (instance).
Students and other academic members of Institute of Informatics can request a copy of the proprietary solver CPLEX, under strictly academic conditions. The software can be downloaded from through OnTheHub website. To request credentials to the OnTheHub, contact Library Chief Beatriz Haro.