DILCISBoard / E-ARK-AIP

E-ARK AIP Specification

https://earkaip.dilcis.eu/

DILCISBoard/E-ARK-AIP Issues

Recommendation for storing and versioning AIPs without the use of BagIt
Updated 5 months ago3
Support for AIP updates when ingesting SIP that refer existing AIPs
Updated 6 months ago1
Using dictionary pairs for requirement history
Updated 7 months ago
Using requirement dictionary pairs for dependencies
Updated 7 months ago
PREMIS profile requirements
Updated a year ago1
METS Profile based requirements definition
Updated a year ago
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation date
Updated a year ago3
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation reference
Closed 2 years ago2
Proposal of adding Retention/Disposal elements: Proposed element Preservation status
Closed 2 years ago2
Proposal of adding Information security classification: Proposed element Classification
Closed 2 years ago2
In a physical AIP, were representations ever considered as being the root?
Closed 2 years ago10
Duplication of images in the specification
Closed 2 years ago1
Proposal of adding Keywords (subjects) to make an IP searchable: Proposed element Keywords
Closed 2 years ago2
PDF image in preface update
Updated 4 years ago
Spec publiser uses old figure 1 for the preface
Closed 4 years ago
figures 10 and 11 too complex
Closed 5 years ago1
Simplification of the overall structure
Closed 5 years ago1
Directory structure is too complex
Closed 5 years ago1
Updating AIP if overwriting is practically impossible
Closed 5 years ago1
AIP export functionality does not reduce costs
Closed 5 years ago1
Does updating original submission lead to forks?
Closed 5 years ago1
Incorrect file name used in figure 11
Closed 5 years ago1
Other characterisation outpout possible?
Closed 5 years ago1
Incorrect file name in figure 11
Closed 5 years ago1
Extra characters
Closed 5 years ago1
Consistent use of symbols in identifiers
Closed 5 years ago1
Revise usage of path replacement characters
Closed 5 years ago1
All extra elements for SIP, AIP and DIP should be included in CSIP
Closed 5 years ago2
Incorrect footnote
Closed 5 years ago1
Documents for the different IPs should be standardized
Closed 5 years ago2
Need for support of versions and variants of AIP
Closed 5 years ago1
Uniform use of folder and directory
Closed 5 years ago4
Figure 5 - two folders named "binary"
Closed 5 years ago1
Summary too much focused on E-ARK project
Closed 6 years ago1
Important attributes such as authorship of the document are missing
Closed 6 years ago1
The Executive Summary needs a major do-over
Closed 6 years ago5
Missing scope of AIP specification
Closed 6 years ago1
We are missing AIP examples in the repository
Closed 7 years ago
Better examples are needed on the file IDs
Closed 7 years ago2
Reference to the wrong section
Closed 7 years ago1
Pointless recommendation or wrong example
Closed 7 years ago1
Enhance the introduction with an explanation of the purpose of the document and the AIP
Closed 7 years ago2
Remove references to E-ARK or add a section explaining what E-ARK was
Closed 7 years ago2
There might be a wrong enforcement in the Requirement 14 (page 16)
Closed 7 years ago1
IPs or SIPs?
Closed 7 years ago1
Explain why we need a Package manifest
Closed 7 years ago1
Sentence is difficult to understand
Closed 7 years ago1
Important diplomatic attributes are missing on the specification document (e.g. authors)
Closed 7 years ago4
Please update the README.md to include more information about the purpose of this repository
Closed 7 years ago1