zfl9 / ipt2socks

将 iptables/nftables 传入的透明代理流量转为 socks5 流量的实用工具

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

[Question] How can I forward traffic across network namespaces with ipt2socks?

phantomcraft opened this issue · comments

I'm trying to forward traffic across namespaces, basically I set up a transparent proxy inside a network namespace and forward the traffic to another one.

I create namespaces and set up all the rest with:

ip netns add nsx
ip netns add nsy
ip link add vethx type veth peer name peerx netns nsx
ip link set vethx up
ip address add 10.0.0.1/24 dev vethx
ip netns exec nsx ip link set peerx up
ip netns exec nsx ip address add 10.0.0.2/24 dev peerx
ip netns exec nsx ip link add vethy type veth peer name peery netns nsy
ip netns exec nsx ip link set vethy up
ip netns exec nsx ip address add 10.0.1.1/24 dev vethy
ip netns exec nsx sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.peerx.forwarding=1
ip netns exec nsx sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.vethy.forwarding=1
ip netns exec nsx sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
ip netns exec nsy ip link set peery up
ip netns exec nsy ip address add 10.0.1.2/24 dev peery
ip netns exec nsy ip route add default via 10.0.1.1 dev peery

Rules are added in the network namespace "nsx":

ip netns exec nsx ip rule add fwmark 1088 table 100
ip netns exec nsx ip route add local default dev vethy table 100

Iptables rule is added:

ip netns exec nsx iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i vethy -p tcp -j TPROXY -s 10.0.1.2 --on-ip 10.0.0.1 --on-port 19040 --tproxy-mark 1088

But when I try to connect I get this:

root@localhost:/home/user# dig @1.1.1.1 duckduckgo.com
; <<>> DiG 9.18.1-1-Debian <<>> @1.1.1.1 duckduckgo.com
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

============================

So, what can be done to make the connection be made successfully?

@zfl9

As I tested, TPROXY can't send packets to non-local address in my scheme. Is there a way to make TPROXY "see" the address passed with --on-ip option if this address is non-local?

commented

对linux namespace这块不是很熟悉,没法给你提供帮助:rofl:

After reading a lot, I realized that the listening port for TPROXY must be listening on a local address, not an external one, so my scheme is impossible to work.

Closing this.