consequentially?
mbunyan opened this issue · comments
In description, did you mean 'number of subsequent requests', rather than 'consequently'?
But then I may be misreading the intentioned functionality.
Interesting to see this kind of functionality being clearly exposed for implementation.
Mike B
"consequentially" is correct word there (and it's not "consequently") meaning that requests are made one by one.
Likely readme should be updated. Interesting info to be included: