Difference between Zip-NeRF and Tri-MipRF?
YJ-142150 opened this issue · comments
Great Work!!!
Could you explain more about "Zip-NeRF introduces a multi-sampling-based method to address the same problem, efficient anti-aliasing, while our method belongs to the pre-filtering-based method."?
Tri-MipRF seems to be much faster. Does the PSNR also higher than Zip-NeRF?
Thanks for your interest. We didn't compare Tri-MipRF with Zip-NeRF in our paper as they are concurrent works. From my point of view, both of the two works try to address the efficiency issue for anti-aliasing NeRF, but Zip-NeRF adopts a multi-sampling-based strategy while our method belongs to the pre-filtering-based method. For PSNR, we can only compare the results on the Blender dataset at the current point.
(Tab.5 from our paper)
(Tab.4 from ZipNeRF paper)
Wow! It seems Tri-MipRF is better than Zip-NeRF in Blender synthetic dataset!!
Did you tried on nerf-360 dataset, too?
Can Tri-MipRF support 360 unbounded scene ? the experiment datasets in paper are objects with mask. thanks.
Currently， it cannot support unbounded 360 scenes