Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read
kawax opened this issue Β· comments
Bug report
- Version: 0.5.2. Same for 0.4.0.
- URL: No
- Repository: No
api/index.php
<?php
phpinfo();
vercel.json
{
"outputDirectory": ".",
"functions": {
"api/*.php": {
"runtime": "vercel-php@0.5.2"
}
}
}
> Installing Builder: vercel-php@0.5.2
--
| π Downloading user files
| π Downloading PHP runtime files
| π Creating lambda
| Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read
Description
When First deploy
or Redeploy without existing Build Cache.
This error occurs.
If a build cache exists, no error occurs.
This error does not occur in projects that do not use vercel-php.
Thank you for the report. I will take a look after holidays.
same issue here:
[00:25:43.642] Cloning github.com/sunxyw/yard (Branch: main, Commit: 35751b7)
[00:25:43.960] Previous build cache not available
[00:25:44.180] Cloning completed: 537.995ms
[00:25:44.708] Running "vercel build"
[00:25:45.364] Vercel CLI 28.10.0
[00:25:45.596] > Installing Builder: vercel-php@0.5.2
[00:25:50.321] π Downloading user files
[00:25:50.322] π Downloading PHP runtime files
[00:25:50.432] π Creating lambda
[00:25:51.270] Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read
Bug report
- Version: 0.5.2. Same for 0.4.0.
- URL: No
- Repository: No
api/index.php
<?php phpinfo();
vercel.json
{ "outputDirectory": ".", "functions": { "api/*.php": { "runtime": "vercel-php@0.5.2" } } }> Installing Builder: vercel-php@0.5.2 -- | π Downloading user files | π Downloading PHP runtime files | π Creating lambda | Error: EISDIR: illegal operation on a directory, read
Description
When
First deploy
orRedeploy without existing Build Cache.
This error occurs.If a build cache exists, no error occurs.
This error does not occur in projects that do not use vercel-php.
Currently experiencing the same issue. Initially used vercel-php 0.3.2 and tried to update it to 0.5.2 but the same issue still occurs.
Not occurring now.
Maybe resolved.
I have the same settings, and it doesn't work for me.
Hey there, we believe this should be fixed on the Vercel side. Please let us know! π
Thank you. It's solved.