publisher, permissions
hlapin opened this issue · comments
I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by them?
The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think,
but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go
with the semicolon-separated list there.
For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual
and are the way to go.
Travis
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin <
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:
I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do
this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same
publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions
with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by
them?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7
Makes sense to me. Assuming Trevor agrees, I will make those adjustments and close this issue.
On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Travis Brown wrote:
The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think,
but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go
with the semicolon-separated list there.For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual
and are the way to go.Travis
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin <
reply@reply.github.comwrote:
I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do
this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same
publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions
with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by
them?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7 (comment)
PS: Any pointer on where I went wrong with my pipeline?
On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Travis Brown wrote:
The TEI schema itself would allow multiple elements, I think,
but the prose of the guidelines suggests this isn't okay, so I'd say go
with the semicolon-separated list there.For collaborators from another group I think s with the usual
and are the way to go.Travis
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, hlapin <
reply@reply.github.comwrote:
I raised the issue of a co-publisher earlier. Any suggestion of how to do
this? (I think Oxford uses copublishers separated by semicolons in the same
publication statement). In addition, I am collaborating on transcriptions
with another group. How to I note this, when the transcription is done by
them?
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#7 (comment)
I agree that additional s for the other transcribers is the way to go.
For publishers—if "publisher" seems like the appropriate semantics for all parties then I agree with semicolons. Might one be a and one (or more) a , http://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/ref-sponsor.html ?
Either way seems fine to me.