Support Kotlin 1.9.20

Question

Support Kotlin 1.9.20

drewhamilton opened this issue 10 months ago · comments

1.9.20-Beta appears to remove the setUseIR function, so tests crash at runtime.

'void org.jetbrains.kotlin.cli.common.arguments.K2JVMCompilerArguments.setUseIR(boolean)'
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: 'void org.jetbrains.kotlin.cli.common.arguments.K2JVMCompilerArguments.setUseIR(boolean)'
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.KotlinCompilation$commonK2JVMArgs$1.invoke(KotlinCompilation.kt:304)
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.KotlinCompilation$commonK2JVMArgs$1.invoke(KotlinCompilation.kt:279)
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.AbstractKotlinCompilation.commonArguments(AbstractKotlinCompilation.kt:172)
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.KotlinCompilation.commonK2JVMArgs(KotlinCompilation.kt:279)
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.KotlinCompilation.compileJvmKotlin(KotlinCompilation.kt:452)
	at com.tschuchort.compiletesting.KotlinCompilation.compile(KotlinCompilation.kt:628)
	at dev.drewhamilton.poko.PokoCompilerPluginTest.compilation of valid class succeeds(PokoCompilerPluginTest.kt:221)

Martin Bonnin · Answer 1 · Tue Sep 26 2023 17:19:04 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Can you try with this branch? #388

Jayson Minard · Answer 2 · Tue Sep 26 2023 19:57:22 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

This is likely to tail from branch #388 still:

args.useIR = useIR

I think this is now inferred as the opposite of useOldBackend in the compiler code.

Drew Hamilton · Answer 3 · Sat Sep 30 2023 02:54:30 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

@martinbonnin Yep, my tests pass if I do an includeBuild with #388's branch.

Matthew Haughton · Answer 4 · Sun Oct 08 2023 19:01:28 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Testing of #394 which is a slightly more complete PR would be appreciated too if anyone has the chance.

Drew Hamilton · Answer 5 · Thu Oct 12 2023 11:40:28 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Yep, confirmed #394's branch works for me too.

Piotr Krzemiński · Answer 6 · Mon Nov 06 2023 05:21:51 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Is there any traction in this ticket? My tests are failing on 1.9.20. @tschuchortdev

Martin Bonnin · Answer 7 · Mon Nov 06 2023 05:27:14 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

@krzema12 until support gets added upstream you can use @ZacSweers fork that should have much better support for newer versions of Kotlin: https://github.com/ZacSweers/kotlin-compile-testing

Federico Tomassetti · Answer 8 · Sat Dec 16 2023 21:36:40 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Also running in this issue. It would be nice to get a new release with support for 1.9.20

kw · Answer 9 · Thu Jan 04 2024 04:37:25 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Also running into this issue! Is there an estimate for when we'll get the new release to support 1.9.20?

NinjaCookie84 · Answer 10 · Wed Jan 24 2024 20:02:18 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Also running into this issue. Would love to see progress here. Any way to help speed this up? (Not sure if I can though)

Fabien Recco · Answer 11 · Wed May 22 2024 02:42:27 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

@krzema12 until support gets added upstream you can use @ZacSweers fork that should have much better support for newer versions of Kotlin: https://github.com/ZacSweers/kotlin-compile-testing

Is it possible to make a Pull Request on this repo or the code base has changed a lot?

Thilo Schuchort · Answer 12 · Mon May 27 2024 00:03:42 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

I have just made a new release updated for Kotlin v1.9.24 and with a bunch of bug fixes cherrypicked from forks: https://github.com/tschuchortdev/kotlin-compile-testing/releases/tag/1.6.0

As for Kotlin v2.0.0, I've taken a look at it and it seems to be a lot of work with changes in both KAPT and KSP as I can see from the work that Zac Sweers has already done on this. I'll see if I can merge changes from his fork back later so they don't diverge too much. Honestly, you're probably better off using Zac Sweers' fork if you need quick updates. I'm doing Scala work nowadays and don't really use this myself anymore, so my motivation to spend scarce free time on maintenance is dwindling.