Have you tried without msg_body and msg?
isopen opened this issue · comments
I'm not sure if func supports such deep nested cells without using msg_body and msg.
);
...
Most likely this is bad style and it’s not at all a fact that it will work with func, but if so, then you can do without msg_body and msg.
Comments left in the original code may also be affected.
What do you mean "won't work"? Compilation error will arise, in a contract that was already compiled before?
FunC supports this, the contract is compiled