Reconsider whether step_rose() should have

[Emil Hvitfeldt]

Tips for a helpful bug report:

• Please include a minimal reproducible example, a reprex, to demonstrate the bug. If you've never heard of a reprex before, start by reading "What is a reprex" and following the advice there. If we can't reproduce a bug, we can't fit it.

• Here is a good example bug report: #46

• We don't want you to use confidential data; you can use a dataset from modeldata, blind the data, or simulate other data to demonstrate your bug. The functions caret::twoClassSim() or caret::SLC14_1() might be good tools to simulate data for you.

• Unless the problem is explicitly about parallel processing, please run sequentially. Even if it is about parallel processing, please make sure that it runs sequentially first.

• Use set.seed() to ensure any randomness in your code is reproducible.

• Please check https://stackoverflow.com/ or https://community.rstudio.com/ to see if someone has already reported the same problem (see: Yihui's Rule).

• You might need to install these packages to create a reproducible example or share session info:

install.packages(c("reprex", "sessioninfo"), repos = "http://cran.r-project.org")

When you are ready to file the bug 🐛 report, please delete everything above this line:
< -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -->

The problem

I'm having trouble with ...

Reproducible example

## copy your code to the clipboard and run:
reprex::reprex(si = TRUE)

[Emil Hvitfeldt]

I don't remember that past Emil was thinking when opening this issue

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.