Let's discuss performance

[Christian Blades]

I was curious what the performance impact is of your functional implementation vs the classic implementations. I haven't gone in depth, but the results are interesting (in particular the memory allocations for Contains.)

➜  funk-bench git:(master) ✗ go test -benchmem -bench .
testing: warning: no tests to run
BenchmarkContains/Idiomatic-8               1000           1946239 ns/op               0 B/op          0 allocs/op
BenchmarkContains/funk-8                       2         645429814 ns/op        28916552 B/op    3614564 allocs/op
PASS
ok      github.com/christian-blades-cb/funk-bench       4.417s

[Flo]

Hay :)

I haven't done the benchmark yet, but it doesn't surprise me since the reflect API relies on allocations, however it's in my TODO

[Flo]

I have added a performance section in the README, you are totally right on this point we must bring this subject on the table and also provide typesafe solutions (less flexible).

[Flo]

Typesafe implementations are on the way, I will add more benchmarks bit by bit.

[Christian Blades]

Wow! You've been busy! Excellent work.

I'd love to explore why using reflection has so many more allocations, 10 minutes on google wasn't enlightening. Would make a good article.

[Mark R.]

@christian-blades-cb, would doing some memory profiling with the -runtime flag shed some light on the allocation churn?

[Tao Wen]

@thoas I have implemented a way to avoid the cost of reflect.Value

https://github.com/json-iterator/go/blob/master/feature_reflect.go

The general idea only rely on reflect.Type to assemble your function logic through composition. Then working with raw unsafe.Pointer directly. Essentially, interface{} is a reflect.Type + raw pointer.