SEAS Forecasting ontology importing PEP

[Iker Esnaola-Gonzalez]

Hello,

I was analyzing the SEAS Forecasting ontology to reuse it in a prediction use case. I may be wrong, but it seems to me that some concepts might be duplicated (Process & Procedure, Process Execution & Procedure Execution, Process Executor & Procedure Executer). Looking at the description of concepts, I think they are quite similar.

Should the SEAS Forecasting ontology import the PEP 1.1. version instead of the PEP 1.0 version? Are those concepts in the ontology for some particular reason?

Thanks,
Iker Esnaola-Gonzalez

[Maxime Lefrançois]

Thanks for apotting this, both pep 1.0 and 1.1 seem to be transitively imported, I'll have a look asap

[Georg Ferdinand Schneider]

+1, Just curious if this issue has been further evaluated

[Susanne Arndt]

+1