Potential issue
davidp57 opened this issue · comments
Not an issue, yet.
In the commit #9569762eac2a5822b9c0852621ca337e6780412a, you separated Perun's LUA configuration from its code.
That's a good thing to do imho.
However, the generic name you chose ("Config") could lead to collisitions with other scripts, in the future (or maybe now, with scripts we don't know yet).
I'd recommend initializing the "Perun" table in the configuration file, and using it (completing it with code) in the code script.
Yes, good point. Will be fixed.