Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash on some nodes

[keiyow]

I announced an AggregateBonded Transaction with two simple Transfers and a HashLock Transaction.
When I went over all the published nodes, I found a few nodes with transactionStatus outputting an error Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash.
I tested out the same thing several times, and nodes that generated this error were not the same nodes every time.

http://api-01.us-west-1.testnet.symboldev.network:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://api-01.us-west-2.testnet.symboldev.network:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://62.171.160.205:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://34.207.105.94:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://sym-test.opening-line.jp:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://13.212.224.184:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://sym-test-18.opening-line.jp:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://54.196.112.115:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash
http://210.158.180.49:3000 : Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash

And when I look through the error on one node, I found the lockhash information but no partial information there.

$ curl -Ss https://sym-test.opening-line.jp:3001/transactionStatus/6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE | jq -r
{
 "hash": "6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE",
 "code": "Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash",
 "deadline": "42098735088",
 "group": "failed"
}
$ curl -Ss https://sym-test.opening-line.jp:3001/transactions/partial/6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE | jq -r
{
 "code": "ResourceNotFound",
 "message": "no resource exists with id '6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE'"
}
$ curl -Ss https://sym-test.opening-line.jp:3001/lock/hash/6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE | jq -r
{
 "lock": {
  "version": 1,
  "ownerAddress": "98EFE782487345F7401180A3034F1542117583E19DDA95EB",
  "mosaicId": "2CF403E85507F39E",
  "amount": "10000000",
  "endHeight": "180915",
  "status": 0,
  "hash": "6C308A4E9488E7C2868F17FD9F831DCB9CBB822876072FAE4EE9E9492C975FFE"
 },
 "id": "604AE8E7CFAE2A0907D01F7B"
}

[gimre]

transaction hash lock needs to be known/present BEFORE you create aggregate bonded transaction.
tbh It's pretty surprising that the last node returned anything...

ignore the above, maybe I misunderstood something, can you write exactly what transactionS you have made and in what order?

[keiyow]

Thank you for the response.

I've created a simple transaction.
The endpoint is set to a random public URL.

https://gist.github.com/keiyow/638204e82d4b2de8e7c6366892e7a8d4

After creating the hash lock transaction, I checked on all the nodes and found the error.

txhash=[[replace txhash]]; for i in `curl -Ss http://beacon-01.us-west-2.testnet.symboldev.network:4001/nodes | jq -r ".[]|select(.roles == 2 or .roles == 3 or .roles == 6 or .roles == 7)|.url = \"http://\" + .host + \":3000\"|.url"`; do echo -n "$i : "; curl $i/transactionStatus/${txhash} -sS -m 10 | jq -r ".code" ; done

[XEMBook]

I was also able to reproduce it relatively easily.

http://18.195.160.73:3000/transactionStatus/9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68

{"hash":"9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68","code":"Failure_LockHash_Unknown_Hash","deadline":"42309932708","group":"failed"}

http://18.195.160.73:3000/transactions/partial/9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68

{"code":"ResourceNotFound","message":"no resource exists with id '9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68'"}

http://18.195.160.73:3000/lock/hash/9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68

{"lock":{"version":1,"ownerAddress":"985B967F057904AACFB08B4B6584DA811E671E4733CA6F9E","mosaicId":"2CF403E85507F39E","amount":"10000000","endHeight":"187427","status":0,"hash":"9AFAF027A3CF9FC4205A04487930D15729AEAF3106201D9C8089A78591257D68"},"id":"604E21B56C1EC462E4E00ED8"}

I think 18.195.160.73 is api-01-eu-central-1
script is like this

tx = nem.TransferTransaction.create(
    nem.Deadline.create(epochAdjustment),
    alice.address, 
    [],
    nem.PlainMessage.create('test'),
    networkType
);

feeTx = nem.TransferTransaction.create(
    nem.Deadline.create(epochAdjustment),
    bob.address, 
    [networkCurrency.createRelative(1)],
    nem.EmptyMessage,
    networkType
);

aggregateTx = nem.AggregateTransaction.createBonded(
    nem.Deadline.create(epochAdjustment),
    [
    feeTx.toAggregate(alice.publicAccount),
    tx.toAggregate(bob.publicAccount),
    ],
    networkType,[],
).setMaxFeeForAggregate(500, 1);

signedAggregateTx = alice.sign(aggregateTx, generationHash);

hashLockTx = nem.HashLockTransaction.create(
    nem.Deadline.create(epochAdjustment),
	networkCurrency.createRelative(10),
	nem.UInt64.fromUint(480),
	signedAggregateTx,
	networkType
).setMaxFee(600);

signedLockTx = alice.sign(hashLockTx, generationHash);

listener.open().then(() => {
    transactionService.announceHashLockAggregateBonded(
      signedLockTx,
      signedAggregateTx,
      listener

    ).subscribe(aggTx => console.log(aggTx))
});

[Jaguar0625]

Can you confirm if either of the transactions made it into the chain?

[Jaguar0625]

After talking with @rg911, we think this is an SDK issue and will move there.