Open to PRs?
cmorganBE opened this issue · comments
We've got some use for this for internal testing of a blufi enabled system, this looks like the best (and maybe the only?) python blufi implementation. Would you be open to reviewing any PRs we had? I figured I'd ask before we submit any in case this isn't the case and we should instead carry our own fork.
yeah totally. The use / API is all experimental and fairly rough draft. Open to PRs or even recommending a maintained fork for others.
I searched fairly long and hard for an existing implementation before doing it myself.
Appreciate the work you've done here. If/when I have some suggestions for changes I'll open up some PRs for review.