Can we use dos2unix instead own implementation here
markusweigelt opened this issue · comments
What do you mean dos2unix?
I suspected here that this replacement takes place to avoid certain windows characters but it is general and has nothing to do with it. :-/
I think since the workflows are written independently of the linux system it can come to problems at this point when CR LF newlines are not converted.
I think since the workflows are written independently of the linux system it can come to problems at this point when CR LF newlines are not converted.
Yes, to make this compatible with the DOS/Windows EOL convention, you need #12