The `stacks` sub-command sometimes misses stacks
skx opened this issue · comments
Steve Kemp commented
When a stack is present in multiple states it might get excluded.
- Imagine you create a stack, then delete it.
- Later you create a stack with the same name.
This results in two stacks in the list-stack output :
- One in DELETE_COMPLETE state
- One in CREATE_COMPLETE state
Depending on the random ordering this might get excluded. We need to build/maintain a list of the stack-stats not a simple key=>value hash, which will overwrite the stack-details.