A couple of questions
ceresti-mrw opened this issue · comments
ceresti-mrw commented
- Is there a reason that the /me/videos call is not supported?
- Is there a reason why not all of the JSON returned it put into the Video struct?
Dmitriy Sokolov commented
Is there a reason that the /me/videos call is not supported?
I put this in the documentation here and here. And take a look at the code. Sorry, the description of the methods is pretty meager, but I'm working on it!
Is there a reason why not all of the JSON returned it put into the Video struct?
What do you have in mind? One of the fields is missing?
ceresti-mrw commented
Thanks for responding so quickly.
My bad, I did not see the ‘Me’ documentation.
I do need access to the ‘File’ subtree of the JSON response. I’ve just added this in the fork I created and am now testing it. It would be great if it came directly from your version.
Mark
…On Aug 23, 2017, 12:32 PM -0700, Dmitriy Sokolov ***@***.***>, wrote:
> Is there a reason that the /me/videos call is not supported?
I put this in the documentation here and here. And take a look at the code. Sorry, the description of the methods is pretty meager, but I'm working on it!
> Is there a reason why not all of the JSON returned it put into the Video struct?
What do you have in mind? One of the fields is missing?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
Dmitriy Sokolov commented
Well ... i waiting commit in your fork (or PR)
ceresti-mrw commented
Sorry … I didn’t understand that you were waiting. I’ll get that out today.
…On Aug 24, 2017, 1:07 AM -0700, Dmitriy Sokolov ***@***.***>, wrote:
Well ... i waiting commit/PR in your fork
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.