License problem
NoahSchiro opened this issue · comments
Noah Schiro commented
Disclaimer: not a lawyer, however, I don't think including a section in the README that says the license is MIT is not sufficient to make the work here covered under MIT, and it might be possible to argue that this repo is actually copyrighted (as this is the default state for software in absence of a license).
I would suggest creating a LICENSE file and include the MIT text. I will submit a PR here shortly