[Question] Is it intentional that this repository is not licensed, or did you just forget to put it on?
Kyure-A opened this issue · comments
Hello.
I found your repository for creating handwriting fonts. I looked at it and thought it was a great example in progress. I forked this repository and tried to create a font with my handwriting. However, when I forked it, I realized that this repository is not licensed.
The question is: did you intentionally release only the code and handwriting, or did you forget to license it? This is what I mean. If this is the latter, we would like to have the license added. (If it was the former, my apologies for failing to capture your intent)
Or is there some other intention? I would appreciate it if you could tell me.
Thank you :)
Hi @Kyure-A, thanks for raising the issue! I haven't had a chance to make it for a while but I've added a license just now.
The purpose of this public repository is to provide a simple example for someone who digs into how to create a font, however, I was not expecting this repository to be forked as a template. I guess you need only one or two small scripts and you also need to change them more or less. Alternatively, you could also just look into the code in this repository as a reference and write your own code from scratch, in which way, you won't need to worry about licensing so much. (Of course, it's also fine to fork a repository and change them accordingly as you tried)
Anyway, good luck with your handwriting font project!
Hi, @saltcandy123, thanks for the quick response!
I'll build on this and keep up the work on the font!
Thank you again.