Approximate Pareto front for RE21 is incorrect?
bolongcheng opened this issue · comments
The values in reference_points_RE21.dat
don't match what was shown in the Figure 2a in the paper.
Thanks, but I do not think so. It seems that the two-dimensional points in "reference_points_RE21.dat" and Fig. 2a are the same.
Ok, my mistake here. I have trouble getting any results that's close to the Pareto front that you have for this particular problem (while having no trouble at all with the other problems). For example:
RE21:
RE22:
I am implementing the functions in python using the supplement material. I think there is perhaps a typo in the matlab code. Should E = 2e5
instead of E = 2 * 10e5
which is not 2 x 10^5
as you have written in the supplement. Maybe this is the cause?
Thanks.
Thank you for the explanation. You are right. "E = 2 * 10e5" (=2 * 10^6) should be "E = 2e5" (=2 * 10^5).
"G = 11.5 * 10e+6" (=11.5 * 10^7) in RE25 should also be "G = 11.5 * 1e+6" (=11.5 * 10^6).