Approximate Pareto front for RE21 is incorrect?

Question

Approximate Pareto front for RE21 is incorrect?

bolongcheng opened this issue 4 years ago · comments

The values in reference_points_RE21.dat don't match what was shown in the Figure 2a in the paper.

Ryoji Tanabe · Answer 1 · Wed Aug 12 2020 08:39:09 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Thanks, but I do not think so. It seems that the two-dimensional points in "reference_points_RE21.dat" and Fig. 2a are the same.

Harvey · Answer 2 · Wed Aug 12 2020 10:31:45 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Ok, my mistake here. I have trouble getting any results that's close to the Pareto front that you have for this particular problem (while having no trouble at all with the other problems). For example:
RE21:

RE22:

I am implementing the functions in python using the supplement material. I think there is perhaps a typo in the matlab code. Should E = 2e5 instead of E = 2 * 10e5 which is not 2 x 10^5 as you have written in the supplement. Maybe this is the cause?

Thanks.

Ryoji Tanabe · Answer 3 · Wed Aug 12 2020 11:02:14 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

Thank you for the explanation. You are right. "E = 2 * 10e5" (=2 * 10^6) should be "E = 2e5" (=2 * 10^5).

Ryoji Tanabe · Answer 4 · Wed Aug 12 2020 11:07:48 GMT+0800 (China Standard Time)

"G = 11.5 * 10e+6" (=11.5 * 10^7) in RE25 should also be "G = 11.5 * 1e+6" (=11.5 * 10^6).