Koogn
Schema-less validation for JavaScript
Introduction
Sooner or later you're gonna need to somehow verify that the data you're working with conforms to what you expect them to be like. For example, that the email submitted to your API endpoint has proper format or that the value that should be a number doesn't receive a string.
There's a plenty of great libraries for exactly that but all of them needs you to create some kind of blueprint, a schema describing the structure of the data.
Koogn works differently. Instead of validating data (let's say a javascript object) against a schema, it compares it to just another javascript object - an example. Koogn is smart, so it can analyze structure of your example object and object you want to validate to make proper comparison.
Advantages
- Very simple to use
- You don't need to define schema, just use some
example
data - Most of the time you even don't need to prepare the
example
. You probably already have it. Yourexample
data is the data you are testing your program/API/whathever with or the output it generates. - If you ever find yourself in need of a bit more complex validation scenarios, it's easy to extend your
example
using a simple syntax to get what you need. - There's no performance drawbacks for all these features (see more on that bellow)
- Just by looking at it, the
example
data clearly communicates how the data should look like
Example
Let's say we want to validate this object:
const book = {
title: 'Saved by Koogn',
authors: ['David Ruzicka'],
releaseDate: '2018-02-03',
}
The only thing that we need is another object. example
- the ethalon by which we will compare the book
object.
const {isValid} = require('koogn').createValidator()
const example = {
title: 'Example',
authors: ['John Smith', 'Joe Noel'],
releaseDate: '1967-10-24',
}
isValid(example, book) // returns true
We've determined that the book
object is valid. The structure is the same, types of the properties are the same and
the format of releaseDate
field in both cases is the date.
Just for comparison: To validate exactly the same things using JSON schema requires you to define schema like this:
const schema = {
type: 'object',
properties: {
title: {
type: 'string',
required: true
},
authors: {
type: 'array',
items: {
type: 'string',
required: true
},
required: true
},
releaseDate: {
type: 'string',
format: 'date',
required: true
}
}
Usage
First install Koogn and save it to your project
npm install koogn --save
Then require the package and create validator instance. There are two ways how to do that:
const validator = require('koogn').createValidator()
or
const Validator = require('koogn').Validator
const validator = new Validator()
Both createValidator
function and Validator
constructor can receive configuration object to tweak validator behavior (more on that bellow)
Once you have an validator instance you can use one of these methods to perform validation.
validate(example, instance) performs validation of instance
against provide example
and returns full validation report.
isValid(example, instance) performs validation of instance
against provide example
and returns simple true/false if instance
is valid or not.
throwIfNotValid(example, instance) performs validation of instance
against provide example
and if instance
is not valid, throws an ValidationError
.
const validator = require('koogn').createValidator()
const bookExample = {
title: 'Example',
authors: ['John Smith', 'Joe Noel'],
releaseDate: '1967-10-24',
}
const instance = {
title: 'Saved by Koogn',
authors: ['David Ruzicka'],
releaseDate: '2018-02-03',
}
validator.validate(bookExample, instance)
validator.isValid(bookExample, instance)
validator.throwIfNotValid(bookExample, instance)
All three of those methods can also return validation function with first parameter
already pre-applied. Using it this way is also more performant solution as the
conversion from example object to internal schema needs to happen just once. Let's
demonstrate on isValid
:
const isValidBook = validator.isValid(bookExample) // create test function
isValidBook(instance)
Optional / required properties
By default all properties in provided example
object are considered to be
required
. In case you want some of your object properties to be optional,
you can use reserved property $optional
and pass property name that should
be optional or the array of them:
validator.validate({
id: 1,
author: 'john', // optional property
title: 'The Book',
year: 1940, // optional property
$optional: ['year', 'author']
}, yourData)
If you find your object to have more optional properties than required ones, use
$required
instead. This changes default behaviour and assumes every property is now optional
except the ones specified in $required
.
validator.validate({
id: 1, // the only required field
author: 'john',
title: 'The Book',
year: 1940,
$required: 'id'
}, yourData)
More complex validations
Chances are that your project starts with only simple validation needs. But as your project
grows it may be necessary to handle more complex validation scenarios. Although
Koogn
is mainly intended for simple validation, it can handle even
complex validations by utilizing reserved key $schema
. Through it you can define full jsonschema
for the property with all the features
supported by jsonschema
In the example bellow validation of labels
property is completely overriden by provided schema:
{
id: 11,
name: 'john',
labels: {
$schema: {
type: 'array',
items: {
type: 'string',
minLength: 2,
maxLength: 100
}
}
},
}
Configuration
There's a number of options through which you can configure validator. These are default values:
const options = {
arrays: {
mode: 'all', // first|uniform|all
},
strings: {
formatDetectionMode: 'both', // none|name|content|both
},
objects: {
additionalProperties: false, // false|true
},
}
Options should be passed as a parameter to createValidator
function
const {createValidator} = require('./lib/validator')
const validator = createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'first'}})
or as a parameter to a Validator
constructor:
const {Validator} = require('./lib/validator')
const validator = new Validator({arrays: {mode: 'first'}})
Whatever you like better
arrays options
arrays.mode (all|first|uniform
default is all
)
This option has effect only on arrays containing two or more items
first
- This option takes into account just the first item in any array Rest is ignored.
uniform
- This option makes sure that if there are more items all of them shares the same type and structure.
if not, it throws an error.
all
- If provided example
object contains array of items with mutually incompatible
types/structures, parser will try to come up with least common type/structure and validate against that.
It works in a natural way.
If your example
object contains array of items sharing the same type, than validator imposes
that type restriction on array items:
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'all'}})
const example = [1, 3, 4]
isValid(example, [1, 2]) // true
isValid(example, ['a', 'b']) // false
isValid(example, [1, 2, 'a']) // false
isValid(example, {a: 1}) // false
If your example
object contains array of mixed numbers and strings, validator assumes that such an
array can contain mixture of types so it doesn't impose type restriction on array items:
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'all'}})
const example = ['str', 3, 4]
isValid(example, [1, 2]) // true
isValid(example, ['a', 'b']) // true
isValid(example, [1, 2, 'a']) // true
isValid(example, {a: 1}) // false
If your example
object contains array of objects that shares the same structure. Only objects having the same
structure will pass validation
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'all'}})
const example = [
{a: 1, b: 'str'},
{a: 56, b: 'something'}
]
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588, b: 'aaa'}]) // true
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588}]) // false (second item is missing property 'b')
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588, b: 11}]) // false (b of second item is not string)
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, 22]) // false (second item is not object)
isValid(example, ['a', 'b']) // false (none of the items is object)
If your example
object contains array of objects that doesn't share the same structure. Than the only restriction
applied on array items is to be an object
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'all'}})
const example = [
{a: 1, b: 'str'},
{a: 56, c: [1]} // structure is different than first item
]
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588, b: 'aaa'}]) // true
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588}]) // true (structure doesn't matter)
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, {a: 588, b: 11}]) // true (structure doesn't matter)
isValid(example, [{a: 3, b: 'xxx'}, 22]) // false (second item is not object)
isValid(example, ['a', 'b']) // false (none of the items is object)
If your example
object contains array of items sharing the same type, than validator imposes
that type restriction on array items:
objects options
objects.additionalProperties (true|false
default is false
)
If this option is set to true
then object having extra properties than example
object will still be validated
strings options
strings.formatDetectionMode (none|name|content|both
default is both
)
none
- Validator will make no attempt to detect format of strings in provided
example
object
name
- If string value in provided example
object matches one from the list
bellow, restriction for that format will apply.
{
prop01: 'date', // '2012-07-08'
prop02: 'time', // '16:41:41'
prop03: 'date-time', // '2012-07-08T16:41:41.532Z' (and variants)
prop04: 'utc-millisec', // '1234567890'
prop05: 'regex', // '/a/'
prop08: 'color', // '#ff0000'
prop09: 'style', // 'color: red;'
prop10: 'phone', // '+31 42 123 4567'
prop11: 'email', // 'john@smith.com'
prop12: 'ip-address', // '192.168.0.1'
prop13: 'ipv4', // '192.168.0.1'
prop14: 'ipv6', // 'fe80::1%lo0'
prop15: 'uri', // 'http://www.google.com/'
prop16: 'host-name', // 'www.google.com'
prop17: 'hostname', // 'www.google.com'
prop18: 'alpha', // 'abracadabra'
prop19: 'alphanumeric', // 'abracadabra123'
}
example:
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {stings: 'name'}})
const example = {updatedAt: 'date-time'}
isValid(example, {updatedAt: '2012-07-08T16:41:41.532Z'}) // true
isValid(example, {updatedAt: 'hello'}) // false
isValid(example, {updatedAt: 11}) // false
content
- Similar to name
option but format is autodetected from the value itself
example:
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'content'}})
const example = {updatedAt: '2018-01-01T20:15:31.532Z'}
isValid(example, {updatedAt: '2012-07-08T16:41:41.532Z'}) // true
isValid(example, {updatedAt: 'hello'}) // false
isValid(example, {updatedAt: 11}) // false
both
- Combination of both name
and content
options
example:
const {isValid} = require('./lib/validator').createValidator({arrays: {mode: 'content'}})
const example = {
updatedAt: '2018-01-01T20:15:31.532Z',
createdAt: 'date'
}
isValid(example, {updatedAt: '2012-07-08T16:41:41.532Z', createdAt: '2011-10-01'}) // true
isValid(example, {updatedAt: 'hello', createdAt: '2011-10-01'}) // false
isValid(example, {updatedAt: '2012-07-08T16:41:41.532Z', createdAt: 'hello'}) // false