Compare to rio?
vi opened this issue · comments
This crate seems to be a competitor to rio.
rio should be mentioned in README somehow, ideally in some table that compares ringbahn and rio.
ringbahn and rio are fundamentally different approaches to the problem, comparisons between these are ultimately subjective in many ways. I don't like when libraries try to compare across these sort of deep differences because it never feels like it does justice to both approaches to the problem. I plan to write more soon about why I believe ringbahn's approach is the best approach to using io-uring from Rust.
Also, ringbahn is currently an experiment to demonstrate that a safe, zero-cost, ergonomic API for io-uring is possible within Rust's async ecosystem, but it is not production ready. So its not currently a competitor to any library which claims to be production ready.
As a minimum there can be some See also: rio - another approach to io_uring.