requarks / wiki

Wiki.js | A modern and powerful wiki app built on Node.js

Home Page:https://js.wiki

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

v3 Feature Parity Checklist

NGPixel opened this issue Β· comments

This table tracks the current feature parity state between v2 and v3. The plan is to stay in beta until all v2 features have been implemented in v3. If you rely on features that are not yet implemented in v3, it's recommended to stay on v2 for now.

Note: this table doesn't list any new feature exclusive to v3, such as multi-sites.

Note: The state Not Implemented may refer to v2 code that has not been adapted yet or not connected yet. Most features are re-using code from v2 when possible.

Administration

Site

Feature Status Notes
Dashboard 🟩 Implemented
General 🟩 Implemented Now per site.
Locale 🟩 Implemented Now per site.
Navigation 🚫 Deprecated 🟒 Replaced with the navigation editor, accessible from any page.
Pages 🚫 Deprecated πŸ”΄ Will be replaced with a new area accessible by all users.
Tags 🚫 Deprecated πŸ”΄ Will be replaced with a new area accessible by all users.
Theme 🟩 Implemented Now per site.

Groups

Feature Status Notes
View Groups 🟩 Implemented
Create New Group 🟩 Implemented
Edit Group 🟩 Implemented
Delete Group 🟩 Implemented

Users

Feature Status Notes
View Users 🟩 Implemented
Create User 🟩 Implemented
Edit User 🟩 Implemented
Delete User 🟩 Implemented
Search Users 🟩 Implemented

Modules

Feature Status Notes
Analytics πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Authentication 🟨 Partial 🟑 Not functional for 3rd party strategies yet.
Comments πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Rendering 🟨 Partial Editor-specific transformations are now done via the Editors feature. Rendering modules are now strictly for the final HTML stage.
Search Engine 🚫 Deprecated External search engines are no longer supported. Replaced with a single native advanced PostgreSQL search engine.
Storage 🟨 Partial 🟑 Not functional for external storage modules yet.

System

Feature Status Notes
API Access 🟩 Implemented
Extensions 🟩 Implemented
Mail 🟩 Implemented
Security 🟩 Implemented
SSL 🚫 Deprecated Will be replaced with a better solution. The current Let's Encrypt implementation is too buggy.
System Info 🟩 Implemented
Check for New Updates 🟩 Implemented
Utilities 🟨 Partial 🟑 Most utilities are not yet functional.
Dev Tools - Flags 🟩 Implemented New "Experimental" flag to enable unfinished features.
Dev Tools - GraphQL 🟩 Implemented No longer accessible from the admin, but still via /_graphql

Assets

Feature Status Notes
Browse Assets 🟩 Implemented
Create Asset Folder 🟩 Implemented
Upload Asset 🟩 Implemented
Rename Asset 🟩 Implemented
Delete Asset 🟩 Implemented

Authentication

Feature Status Notes
Login (local) 🟩 Implemented
Login (3rd party) πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Logout 🟩 Implemented
Register 🟩 Implemented
Login Step - 2FA 🟩 Implemented
Login Step - 2FA First-time Setup 🟩 Implemented
Login Step - Change Password 🟩 Implemented
Reset Password πŸŸ₯ Not implemented

Editors

Feature Status Notes
Markdown Editor 🟨 Partial 🟒 Mostly functional. Now using the Monaco editor instead of CodeMirror 5
WYSIWYG Editor 🟨 Partial 🟑 Not functional. Output rendering not working yet.
AsciiDoc Editor πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Raw HTML Editor 🚫 Deprecated Use the Markdown editor to include raw HTML instead.
New Page From Template πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Formatting Toolbar (Bold, Italic, etc.) 🟩 Implemented
Insert Link πŸŸ₯ Not implemented can still write links in markdown directly
Insert Images 🟩 Implemented Removed the ability to set image alignment from the assets dialog. Inline controls will be added in the future.
Insert Code Block πŸŸ₯ Not implemented can still write code blocks in markdown directly
Insert Table πŸŸ₯ Not implemented can still write table in markdown directly
Tabsets πŸŸ₯ Not implemented Tabsets will be a block element going forward, rather than using CSS classes
Insert Draw.io πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Spellcheck (markdown) 🚫 Deprecated Dependent on Monaco providing the functionality. No plan to use the preview panel for spellchecking (as in v2).
Preview Panel (markdown) 🟩 Implemented
Scroll Sync (markdown) 🟩 Implemented

Navigation

Feature Status Notes
Breadcrumbs 🟩 Implemented
Browse Mode πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Custom Mode 🟩 Implemented Now features per-path navigation menus

Pages

Feature Status Notes
Create New Page 🟩 Implemented
Convert Page πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Duplicate Page πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Rename / Move Page πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Delete Page 🟩 Implemented
View Page History πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
View Page Source 🟩 Implemented
View Page 🟩 Implemented
Page Author Display 🚫 Deprecated No longer displayed. Might be added as an optional block later.
Page Last Edit Display 🟩 Implemented
Page Tags Display 🟩 Implemented
Page Table of Contents πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Set Page Title / Description 🟩 Implemented Now part of the Page Properties panel. No longer tied to the editor.
Switch to different Locale πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
Page Print View πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
SSR of Pages for SEO πŸŸ₯ Not implemented

Search

Feature Status Notes
Search 🟩 Implemented
Search by tags 🟩 Implemented Tags are now part of the main search. No longer a separate page.
Search autocomplete 🟨 Partial πŸ”΄ Disabled for now until a solution to avoid leaking words from private pages is found.

Users

Feature Status Notes
Edit Profile 🟩 Implemented
Change Password 🟩 Implemented
View User's Groups 🟩 Implemented
View User's Pages πŸŸ₯ Not implemented
commented

Hey @NGPixel this is great!

I'm not sure how many active devs are in the community but could we use this to divide up some of the work with volunteers so get v3 over the line?

I'll also note this list above seems not to include all selectively deprecated features, like 3rd party search engines.

Thanks for the detailed list of features and progress of each. How long will it take you to go Live with V3? What's the roadmap (with phases)?

What would help get the multi-site version out of beta?

@NGPixel we've deployed the latest alpha as a container (from ghcr.io/requarks/wiki:3.0.0-alpha.334) and I was wondering if that's the same as the beta you're talking here right now?

@nwcm 3rd party search engines are listed as deprecated under the "Modules" section.

@simedia-ivansieder There's no beta release yet but yes the alpha.334 is currently the latest build that corresponds to this list. It will transition into beta releases once remaining permission issues are fixed.

looking forward to this new release

looking forward to this new release

@nwcm 3rd party search engines are listed as deprecated under the "Modules" section.

@simedia-ivansieder There's no beta release yet but yes the alpha.334 is currently the latest build that corresponds to this list. It will transition into beta releases once remaining permission issues are fixed.

Thanks for all the amazing work you've put into this project Nick. We are very much looking forward to the beta; in particular our most desired feature is the multisite capability. - if it were available today, we'd already be using it!

Adding you as a sponsor as well - WikiJS has become such a core part of our business operations.

Best Wiki project out there!

Hi, what's default password?

I running wiki:3.0.0-alpha.344 from docker image, the localhost:3000 need me login -- I am very confused, this is first find the site with me.

Use PgSQL, I find admin account is admin@example.com, password is hash string....

Hi, what's default password?

I running wiki:3.0.0-alpha.344 from docker image, the localhost:3000 need me login -- I am very confused, this is first find the site with me.

Use PgSQL, I find admin account is admin@example.com, password is hash string....

Ops, is my mistake! sorry.

I find the Vega branch and find default password (https://github.com/requarks/wiki/tree/vega).

Hi, what's default password?
I running wiki:3.0.0-alpha.344 from docker image, the localhost:3000 need me login -- I am very confused, this is first find the site with me.
Use PgSQL, I find admin account is admin@example.com, password is hash string....

Ops, is my mistake! sorry.

I find the Vega branch and find default password (https://github.com/requarks/wiki/tree/vega).

How stable is this Version? And what about SSO?

Hi, what's default password?
I running wiki:3.0.0-alpha.344 from docker image, the localhost:3000 need me login -- I am very confused, this is first find the site with me.
Use PgSQL, I find admin account is admin@example.com, password is hash string....

Ops, is my mistake! sorry.
I find the Vega branch and find default password (https://github.com/requarks/wiki/tree/vega).

How stable is this Version? And what about SSO?

the version is very "Instability"! I can't save my article..... so I back to 2.x version.

Is this still being worked on? Man I think Wikijs is awesome and I would hate for it to turn into a quill situation where it takes 8 years to get the next major version but then the community has mostly abandoned it by then.

Is there anything we can do to help? I feel like PRs have gone mostly uncommented on or touched and it's extremely discouraging to see that or want to contribute in those cases

@CollinHerber
I completely understand and share your frustration. I've also been eagerly waiting for years since the announcement of wikijs version 3. Every new blog post gets me excited, but the radio silence for the past three months has been disheartening. It feels like promises are being made but never fulfilled.

Seeing pull requests go uncommented and untouched is extremely discouraging, especially for those of us who want to contribute and help move things forward. It's difficult to stay motivated when it seems like there's no progress or communication.

Is there anything we, as a community, can do to help? We’re passionate about Wiki.js and want to see it succeed. Perhaps more transparency about the roadmap and regular updates, even if they are small, could help maintain our enthusiasm and commitment.

Is there anything we, as a community, can do to help? We’re passionate about Wiki.js and want to see it succeed.

Yes - stop being so entitled, and consider becoming a sponsor. @NGPixel has put an unbelievable amount of work into this while balancing that with being a human being.

There's an active Discord where people's support questions are answered usually same day, for an amazing software that provided for free.

There's also new releases happening on schedule - 3.0 is a massive overhaul and 2.0 is still being updated.

If you followed the timeline at all, you will see a lot of progress has been made, and the progress on 2.0 vs 3.0 are not mutually exclusive.

stop being so entitled

@joeldeteves

I think there might be a misunderstanding. My comments are not coming from a place of entitlement but from a genuine desire to see Wiki.js thrive.

I fully acknowledge the immense effort @NGPixel and the team have put into this project, and I am grateful for the incredible software that Wiki.js is. My concern stems from a place of passion and a desire to contribute meaningfully to a project I believe in.

I understand that development takes time and that balancing this with personal commitments is challenging. My suggestion for more transparency and regular updates is meant to foster a stronger community connection and help maintain momentum. It’s not about demanding more, but about finding ways we can support the project and its developers better.

Is there anything we, as a community, can do to help? We’re passionate about Wiki.js and want to see it succeed.

Yes - stop being so entitled, and consider becoming a sponsor. @NGPixel has put an unbelievable amount of work into this while balancing that with being a human being.

There's an active Discord where people's support questions are answered usually same day, for an amazing software that provided for free.

There's also new releases happening on schedule - 3.0 is a massive overhaul and 2.0 is still being updated.

If you followed the timeline at all, you will see a lot of progress has been made, and the progress on 2.0 vs 3.0 are not mutually exclusive.

My Concerns About @NGPixel and Support for Version 3 of the Project

First, I want to clarify that my previous posts, in which I expressed concern for @NGPixel, may have been misunderstood. My concern is genuine and relates to his work-life balance and his overall workload. I am truly concerned about his well-being.

I work on social projects myself and know how hard this work can be. I often spend more than 18 hours helping or working. Since I work without financial compensation, I can't donate money, but I support people in other ways, where I excel. We are building an alternative infrastructure that facilitates mutual aid – free of charge or at cost price. If I had more IT specialists available, I would gladly send them to you, although this is not possible at the moment. But this will hopefully change soon.

It is a fact that many people are currently struggling, especially after these difficult times. Therefore, we should be particularly mindful of each other. My mistake is not being active on Discord, only on GitHub. However, if @NGPixel is doing well, that makes me very happy. I hope that he can continue his work and also enjoy the fruits of his labor.

Meanwhile, I have a question: how many people are working on the project (V3) and how is the work distributed? Is he the only one working on it? It would be inhumane to manage this alone. What do you specifically need, aside from financial support? What kind of hands-on help can be provided?

I find it impressive what you are accomplishing, and I hope we will see further progress soon. I am closely following the Vega branch.

All the best and much strength for the coming times!

No this project isn't dead, I just didn't have time to work on it in the past months. I hope to put some time on it in the coming weeks.

@Lord-KalEl Yes I'm the only one working on it. It's easy to say "get some other devs to help" but the reality is that you need quite capable devs, that have a solid understanding of the project, to be able to help in any meaningful way. And as I'm sure you're aware, adding more people to a project takes even more of your time because you now need to review their code and guide them on how you want things. Add the fact that I'm quite opiniated when it comes to how a feature should work and look.

And before someone ask, no I don't have an ETA so don't ask for one.

Is there anything we, as a community, can do to help? We’re passionate about Wiki.js and want to see it succeed.

Yes - stop being so entitled, and consider becoming a sponsor. @NGPixel has put an unbelievable amount of work into this while balancing that with being a human being.

There's an active Discord where people's support questions are answered usually same day, for an amazing software that provided for free.

There's also new releases happening on schedule - 3.0 is a massive overhaul and 2.0 is still being updated.

If you followed the timeline at all, you will see a lot of progress has been made, and the progress on 2.0 vs 3.0 are not mutually exclusive.

I have been silently following Wiki.js and using it in some of my projects. I heard about v3 a long time ago and have been keeping an eye on the blog.

Today, I saw this issue and then noticed your comment. Dude @joeldeteves , come on, do you really need to be so aggressive? Where did you see anyone trying to be entitled? Everybody just wants provide help and wants to see this amazing project go thriving. Saying things like "if you followed the timeline at all,", dude, this is GitHub, you have to allow that people might not know there's an Wiki.js Discord community, right? Responding in such a tone makes you seem smart?

The funniest part: I did not find your name or your company to be displayed on any backer's page or previous backer's page, anyway, as long as you feel proud about what you did and what you said.

To help others who don't know about the Discord community, here is the link I just found:
Official one: https://discord.com/invite/rcxt9QS2jd
Unofficial one: https://discord.com/invite/Q5Qr4vn75j

@MFYDev Funny you should mention entitlement when I am the one putting my money where my mouth is and sponsoring this project.

WikiJS is free as in beer.

If you don't like the development schedule, or the direction the project is taking; you are free to fork it.

Besides - I am not affiliated with the project or @NGPixel. I am just someone who understands what free means, and how much work goes into a project like this.

You whining in a GitHub thread isn't going to change that.

Could we, please, move on, before it will all escalate to "Yo momma" level? sigh