remy / mit-license

Hosted MIT License with details controlled through this repo

Home Page:mit-license.org

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

Question: MIT License conditions

opened this issue · comments

Hi, if I forked a repository(under MIT License), and close the source code, I need to provide the link/source of original repository MIT License owner right?

However, if I also modify the source code, should I put my copyright & mit license notice in my forked repository?

Example:

Original repository owner license

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2016 Mr Owner

Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

and I modified the code in my forked/cloned repository, for my own use/publishing, and here is the license I think to use -

The MIT License (MIT)

Copyright (c) 2016 Mr Owner
Copyright (c) 2016 dvrein


Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:

The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.

THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.

Note: I changed the copyright section.

So is the second license acceptable?

or should I need to provide my new MIT License separated along with the original owner MIT License or just the original owner license (no mine).

EDIT: So I found my question is related to sublicensing under the same MIT License. However, I still don't know if I can add an additional copyright notice under the same license file, under the Mr Owner part?

Thanks.