flowerType
zedomel opened this issue · comments
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| GUID | |
| Rebipp Class | rebipp:PlantTrait |
| Label | flowerType |
| Definition | The type of flower describing whether the flower's corolla opens or not, exposing its reproductive parts to floral visitors (cleistogamous, chasmogamous or mixed). |
| Comments | Recommended best practice is to use a controlled vocabulary. Example: Plant Trait Ontology |
| Examples | cleistogamous, chasmogamous, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/TO_0000882 |
| Controlled vocabulary | Plant Trait Ontology |
| Darwin Core Class | Occurrence |
| Cardinality | One to one |
| Reference Protocol |
Change term definition to:
The type of flower describing whether the flower's corolla opens or not, exposing its reproductive parts to floral visitors.
I am confused by the controlled vocabulary options...
@fonturbel could you share your thoughts with us? What is confused? The ontology term: http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/TO_0000882 ?
Agree with definiton and vocabulary. Please, include mixed as an option in the controled vocabulary.
Ok with me regarding the terms.
Nothing to add
Nothing to add.
Nothing to add
I believe the name of the trait could be improved here as "flowerType" can be interpreted as other concepts. I suggest changing the name to "flowerOpening" or "flowerOpeningType" to be more specific to the user. Moreover, I agree with adding the "mixed cleistogamous and chasmogamous" option to the controlled vocabulary.
I agree with @cepnunes "flowerType can be interpreted as other concepts" (e.g. corolla type) and I agree with @viniciusduartina.
The point raised by @cepnunes is important to be considered.
Nothing else to add.
New label: flowerOpeningType
New definition: The type of flower describing whether the flower's corolla opens or not, exposing its reproductive parts