Pincode boundaries data seems noisy
nikhil-scholarlify opened this issue · comments
Thanks for all this amazing work! Just flagging an example case here.
https://github.com/ramSeraph/indian_admin_boundaries/releases/tag/postal
Preview link over Pune: https://indianopenmaps.fly.dev/not-so-open/pincodes/view#11.41/18.5303/73.8397
Many of the polygons aren't carrying any pincode value.
And most of Pune city is covered by a single polygon with value: 411045. That's certainly not the case.
Hey.. maybe I should have clarified. This is what I could find on the postalgis site. This is just raw data. I didn't clean anything. That goes for all the data in this repo.
I actually want to check if we are just looking at the village boundaries with pincode tagged to them. Anyway I will try add notes with your feedback atleast
I did check the pincode boundaries against village boundaries.. they have common borders but they are not the same.
And I have updated the notes for pincode boundaries to reflect your feedback.