Is there a bug on waterbridge atom index?
freeenergylab opened this issue · comments
alanlpf commented
Hey here,
I renamed the complex.pdb
to complex.pdb.txt
here so that I can upload this file on GitHub here.
For ligand called L1
, the waterbridge
interactions have inconsistent atom index in report.txt with those in complex.pdb
.
Is there a bug about it?
Thanks!
Florian Kaiser commented
Hi,
PLIP pre-processes and, if necessary, protonates the input. This could change the atom numbering. Did PLIP generate a plipfixed
PDB file? And what was the exact command line call you issued?