[grammar] rdf:type shorthand a isn't properly recognized inside bnode literal
peta opened this issue · comments
When written inside a bnode literal on a separate line (optionally preceded by whitespace chars) the language grammar won't match it.
Example:
ex:Subj ex:pred [ a ex:ClassA; # matched
a ex:ClassB; # not matched
a ex:ClassC; # not matched
].
Fixed + closed with: e709c72