ARM64 support
odidev opened this issue · comments
OrientDB is working pretty well for arm64v8 architecture.
I would be happy to raise a PR if you allow me to do so.
Moreover, this doesn't even require changes in Dockerfile too.
The only thing which is required is to either add a new folder for arm64v8 or just expose contents of x86_64 outside to be used for both x86_64 & arm64v8.
I can provide Build & Run logs as well for confirmation.
Regards,
@luigidellaquila
Hi Luigi,
Should I go for adding a new folder for arm64v8 or delete x86_64 folder?
Regards,
@luigidellaquila - Raised PR as per your guidance 😄
Please have a look.
Regards,
@luigidellaquila is this repo still being maintained?
I submitted PR #53 nearly a year ago. It has been reworked since too.
It looks like new commits have been applied with conflicted with PR #53
I have rebased, fixed the conflicts and re-pushed the pull-request.
I'm sorry to bring this zombie issue back from the mists of time but, IMHO, since the new Apple laptops are starting to be more and more common this request becomes relevant again.
I have just built an multiarch amd64/arm64 docker version of OrientDB using https://github.com/orientechnologies/orientdb-docker/blob/master/release/3.2.x/3.2.4/Dockerfile without any issue, so there does not seem to be much problem with it. However, it would be much nicer if we could just pull it from Dockerhub directly.
Many thanks guys! :)
@luigidellaquila Would you be able to share any update on this issue?
Pulling orientdb (orientdb:3.2.4)...
3.2.4: Pulling from library/orientdb
ERROR: no matching manifest for linux/arm64/v8 in the manifest list entriesI was able to build an arm64 container from the official Dockerfile as suggested above, but this solution seems to have extremely poor performance – simply creating a database takes over 10 seconds.
Hi,
any updates about providing official docker images for arm64? Image build from official Dockerfile works fine.
Hi,
I saw some work has been done and merged, but one of the last PR was not merged, I will be happy to review and merge a PR that add arm64 support for 3.0.x, 3.1.x, 3.2.x without change other architectures.
Regards
What is needed to add support for arm64? The Dockerfile is architecture independent and relies on eclipse-temurin which has the arm64 image.
We could use this as well. Getting tired of the "death by a thousand cuts" of using Apple Silicon. We have had to manually build & privately publish our own Docker images. :/
Hi,
ARM64 build should be published on docker.io