[PRE REVIEW]: DSSE: An environment for simulation of reinforcement learning-empowered drone swarm maritime search and rescue missions
editorialbot opened this issue · comments
Submitting author: @renatex333 (Renato Laffranchi Falcão)
Repository: https://github.com/pfeinsper/drone-swarm-search
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): main
Version: 1.1.7
Editor: @kanishkan91
Reviewers: @draabe, @wob86
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/57c2c7323124206325d600d34cfecbcf"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/57c2c7323124206325d600d34cfecbcf/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/57c2c7323124206325d600d34cfecbcf/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/57c2c7323124206325d600d34cfecbcf)
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @renatex333. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@renatex333 if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
@editorialbot commands
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (1362.2 files/s, 189488.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
JSON 3 0 0 2175
Python 19 412 236 1855
Markdown 13 304 0 857
YAML 4 18 16 144
TeX 1 11 0 127
CSS 1 18 55 66
TOML 1 6 0 63
SVG 3 1 0 18
TypeScript 1 1 3 13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 46 771 310 5318
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
135 Pedro2712
56 RicardoRibeiroRodrigues
56 renatex333
52 Luis Filipe Carrete
43 leonardo.malta
36 Manuel Castanares
21 Enrico
17 JJ
13 leonardodma
11 JorasOliveira
11 Renato
8 Joras Oliveira
8 Renato Laffranchi Falcão
2 Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues
1 Fabricio J Barth
1 Leonardo Malta
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.110098 is OK
- 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116403 is OK
- 10.5194/gmd-11-1405-2018 is OK
- 10.1038/nature14236 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.1707.06347 is OK
- 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.113444 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Safety and Shipping Review
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Drowning
- No DOI given, and none found for title: International Aeronautical and Maritime Search and...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Pettingzoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement lear...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: PettingZoo: Gym for multi-agent reinforcement lear...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Exploration and Rescue of Shipwreck Survivors usin...
INVALID DOIs
- None
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md
is 892
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need
section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License
(Valid open source OSI approved license)
👋 @renatex333 - thanks for your submission to JOSS. We are currently managing a large backlog of submissions and the editor most appropriate for your area is already rather busy.
For now, we will need to waitlist this paper and process it as the queue reduces. Thanks for your patience!
@editorialbot assign @kanishkan91 as editor
Assigned! @kanishkan91 is now the editor
@draabe Given your publication of floodlight.py in JOSS a while ago, would you be interested in reviewing this software package for JOSS?
@gagolews Would you be interested in reviewing this manuscript for JOSS given your previous reviews and interests?
Unfortunately, I have too many reviews pending at the moment.
Unfortunately, I have too many reviews pending at the moment.
@gagolews Np. Thanks for taking a look!
@freddiev4 Came across your profile on the JOSS database. Would you be interested in reviewing this software package and paper for JOSS?
@wob86 Came across your profile on the JOSS database. Would you be interested in reviewing this software package and paper for JOSS?
@kanishkan91 happy to do it!
@kanishkan91 yep definitely
@editorialbot add @draabe as reviewer
@draabe added to the reviewers list!
@editorialbot add @wob86 as reviewer
@wob86 added to the reviewers list!
@renatex333, @wob86 and @draabe - Looks like we are good to get this review going. I'l start over the review in a separate issue and post detailed instructions for both reviewers there. Thanks everyone!
@editorialbot start review
OK, I've started the review over in #6746.