[REVIEW]: MultiPrecisionArrays.jl: A Julia package for iterative refinement
editorialbot opened this issue · comments
Submitting author: @ctkelley (Carl Kelley)
Repository: https://github.com/ctkelley/MultiPrecisionArrays.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): Joss_Paper
Version: v0.1.0
Editor: @vissarion
Reviewers: @vlc1, @imciner2
Archive: Pending
Status
Status badge code:
HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acb40a93b83a948fac316f5cf6adb0f3"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acb40a93b83a948fac316f5cf6adb0f3/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/acb40a93b83a948fac316f5cf6adb0f3)
Reviewers and authors:
Please avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the target repository and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) by leaving comments in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)
Reviewer instructions & questions
@vlc1 & @imciner2, your review will be checklist based. Each of you will have a separate checklist that you should update when carrying out your review.
First of all you need to run this command in a separate comment to create the checklist:
@editorialbot generate my checklist
The reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html. Any questions/concerns please let @vissarion know.
✨ Please start on your review when you are able, and be sure to complete your review in the next six weeks, at the very latest ✨
Checklists
@vlc1, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist
@imciner2, please create your checklist typing: @editorialbot generate my checklist
Hello humans, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.
For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:
@editorialbot commands
For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:
@editorialbot generate pdf
Software report:
github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90 T=0.03 s (2006.0 files/s, 141935.5 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language files blank comment code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia 29 256 772 1306
Markdown 22 391 0 1231
TeX 3 44 0 361
YAML 8 12 9 181
TOML 3 5 0 31
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM: 65 708 781 3110
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commit count by author:
443 Tim Kelley
211 C. T. (Tim) Kelley
5 CompatHelper Julia
Paper file info:
📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 1619
✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section
License info:
✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)
Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):
OK DOIs
- 10.1137/23M1549079 is OK
- 10.1137/17M1122918 is OK
- 10.1137/17M1140819 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9780898718027 is OK
- 10.1137/20M1342902 is OK
- 10.1137/1.9781611977271 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.4284807 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2307.16051 is OK
- 10.5281/zenodo.7521427 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2311.14616 is OK
- 10.1137/141000671 is OK
- 10.1145/1141885.1141894 is OK
- 10.1137/0907058 is OK
MISSING DOIs
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Improving the accuracy of computed eigenvalues and...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Progress Report on the Automatic Computing Engine
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Bi-CGSTAB: A fast and smoothly converging variant ...
INVALID DOIs
- None
👋 @vissarion, @vlc1, @imciner2 - it looks like this review started about a month ago, but nothing has happened since then. Is there anything I can do as track editor to help?
@danielskatz thanks for the heads up!
@vlc1, @imciner2 are you experiencing any difficulties in your review?