openfoodfacts / openfoodfacts-server

Open Food Facts database, API server and web interface - πŸͺπŸ¦‹ Perl, CSS and JS coders welcome 😊 For helping in Python, see Robotoff or taxonomy-editor

Geek Repo:Geek Repo

Github PK Tool:Github PK Tool

πŸ‘ Top Issues Dashboard

github-actions opened this issue Β· comments

A simple dashboard that lists the top issues/bugs/features and pull requests.

Top issues

  1. #2891 πŸ‘15
  2. #2361 πŸ‘6
  3. #7609 πŸ‘5
  4. #5561 πŸ‘4
  5. #3426 πŸ‘4
  6. #9944 πŸ‘3
  7. #9426 πŸ‘3
  8. #9226 πŸ‘3
  9. #9012 πŸ‘3
  10. #5205 πŸ‘3
  11. #4264 πŸ‘3
  12. #3974 πŸ‘3
  13. #3824 πŸ‘3
  14. #2552 πŸ‘3
  15. #1288 πŸ‘3
  16. #622 πŸ‘3
  17. #376 πŸ‘3
  18. #367 πŸ‘3
  19. #9099 πŸ‘2
  20. #8949 πŸ‘2

Top PRs

  1. #9251 πŸ‘2
  2. #10007 πŸ‘1
  3. #9966 πŸ‘1
  4. #9295 πŸ‘1
  5. #5639 πŸ‘1

Created by the rickstaa/top-issues-action action (last update: 5/6/2024, 12:17:58 AM).

@CharlesNepote "automated Quick Wins"

Yes great, @teolemon. The issue is that you have just one point per issue, but better done than perfect.

@teolemon First of all, thanks for trying out my action. I created it to better manage the issues in https://github.com/anuraghazra/github-readme-stats, but, amazingly, people are trying whether it also works for their projects. @CharlesNepote Feel free to create a feature request or pull request if you think the issue can still be improved πŸš€.

@rickstaa thanks a lot for your nice project.

We have tried another method to sort issues: each participant has 100 credits quarterly and he can put them on the issue(s) he wants to. He can put 100 credits on one issue or allocate it on several issues. It allows the participants to express their priorities, which is not possible with the Github system (where all your "votes" are equal). The drawback of this method is that we need to do it by hand :(

I don't know if it's possible to parse Github issues' comments, but we could use a system where people would vote with a simple syntax, something like:
#My_credits_for_this_issue: 80
The parser might detect the hashtag and its corresponding amount, the user and the date of the comment. This way, it might be possible to establish a ranking based on people priorities. Do you think it's possible?

I have opened an issue on your repository: anuraghazra/github-readme-stats#2193

@CharlesNepote Thanks for your feature request. I could not migrate your issue to https://github.com/rickstaa/top-issues-action, so I made a reference and answered it on rickstaa/top-issues-action#94 (comment). If you have other suggestions on how we can implement this feature without hitting the problems described in that issue, feel free to comment πŸ‘πŸ».