Bug: License information is incomplete
dominicduffin1 opened this issue · comments
Describe the bug
Under the License heading it states that contributors agree to their contributions being licensed under the MIT license, but not all Open Sauced repositories use that license. For example, open-sauced/app uses the Apache-2.0 license.
The License subsection in the docs should contain information that reflects the current legal status of the repositories, or more general language such as "you agree that your contributions will be licensed under the repository's license".
Steps to reproduce
Browsers
Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Edge, Opera
Additional context (Is this in dev or production?)
No response
Code of Conduct
- I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
Contributing Docs
- I agree to follow this project's Contribution Docs
Hey @dominicduffin1. How are you doing with this?
Hi @CBID2 , sorry I didn't see I'd been assigned to the issue 😥. Does the team have a preference between adding the different licenses or keeping the language more general?
Hi @CBID2 , sorry I didn't see I'd been assigned to the issue 😥. Does the team have a preference between adding the different licenses or keeping the language more general?
Hey @dominicduffin1. I'm not too sure. @bdougie, what do you think?
I'd personally prefer more general language: different repos may carry different licenses which may carry their own different contributor attribution statements. And in the future, even if we did capture each of the different licenses and attributions we have today, we'd maybe adopt a different ones in new repos that would drift from fine grained documentation. So, more a more general approach in the docs makes sense to me.
🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 1.43.0 🎉
The release is available on:
Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀